A challenge; "Draw me a picture of what the future is going to look like."

"Draw me a picture of what the future is going to look like."

"Maybe it means something, like a map or something."

"I've matched these numbers to the dates to every global disaster of the last 50 years in perfect sequence; earthquakes, fires, tsunamis.  The next number on the chain predicts tomorrow, somewhere on the planet, 81 people are going to die, in some kind of tragedy."

"Systems that find meaning in numbers are a dime a dozen.  Why?  Because people see what they want to see."

"The numbers are a warning."

"What happens when the numbers run out?"



In the movie, "Knowing," we have a perfect "map" of thought laid out which we may follow. 

The plot and evidence.  Fictional Lucinda Embry drew a picture, a map, of numbers that, 50 years later and without theretofore discovery, re-told a trouble astrophysics professor, John Koestler, the great tragic events of those 50 years, and the last 3 events yet to occur.  He proved the numbers to events that had occurred and as those last 3 events occurred.  Entirely fictional but thoughtful.

Ultimately, Professor Koestler could not refute the truth of the Lucinda Embry's map.

WD Gann drew a picture, "Map of Time," or MOT, of the future in his 1927 "The Tunnel Thru the Air" and encoded it into the acrostic/telestic words and into mathematic devices found in "The Tunnel Thru the Air."  The MOT was proven on September 11, 2015 by the same method the Professor proved Lucinda's map.  Many of those encoded words and devices are as clear in intention and content as the perfection of mathematics.  There's an abundance of confirmation and/or collateral messages that create a web of evidence and confound the intellectually honest but otherwise doubtful:

• the 6th prophecy of 9/11 and the date of and the deaths that day,
• the 7th prophecy that I would discover and confirm my name and identity in TTTTA,
• dozens of acrostic/telestic words describing events yet to occur after TTTTA's publication,
• the name of the author of "Knowing,"Ryne Pearson Douglas, encoded in TTTTA,
• the perfect math and undeniable foresight of the phrase "Tip the hat,".....
• even, the simple narrative predictions of the Great Depression and WWII found on page 82.

The challenge.  Any person of math and logic cannot, in Emerson and Swedenborg's concept of "intellectual character," dismiss and avoid the truth of these facts and circumstances as evidence.  Yet, without any consideration, Professor Koestler's presentation of the "map" is rejected by his learned associate as a system not worth a "dime a dozen." Similarly, within minutes of my presentation of the 7th Prophecy, I was attacked as "having lost it." There wasn't time for consideration of the evidence...simply an intellectually bigoted reaction to such an affront of the norm of thinking.

So the challenge to Professor Koestler was, "can these things of so vastly improbable proportions be cast aside without due consideration?" Can a person of "intellectual character" convict without trial?

The evidence in real time.  In a series of events, the Professor experienced in real time the evidence; there was the Gulf oil rig disaster (water), the airplane terrorist disaster (air), the subway attack (land) and, finally, the solar flare (fire).  Fictional of course.

Similarly, we have dates in the WD Gann Map of Time and some varying evidence of their importance, February 21-24, March 2-19, May 9 and October 19 of 2016.  The first of the dates, February 21-24, and more specifically, February 24, and its expected nature, is sourced and documented in many essays.  The remaining dates are not consequential unless the first is "proven by time," as Mr. Gann might say, as true.

That date, February 24 is very consequential to perhaps "one third" of all person in our nation and, perhaps the world, given that a great percentage of all persons live within 50 miles of coastal areas.

Should the predicted events of February 24 prove true, then, as Professor Koestler experienced, all of our perceptions of reality and faith will change.  We will have seen the evidence in real time.

The numbers are a warning.  What happens when the numbers run out?  According to the method I have identified in the WD Gann "Map of Time" I believe we reach the end of the numbers (the 168th year of the MOT cycle) and we "begin again." But that's just a method, not a truth.

Mr. Gann reprises the words of Mark 13:20 and Mathew 24:22 three times in TTTTA: