Quantcast
Channel: Market Time and Price Townhall
Viewing all 418 articles
Browse latest View live
↧

Interesting acrostic and telestic words on the date of Osama Bin Laden's death - "Seal Team 6"

January 17, 2016, 5:24 pm
$
0
0
We find the acrostic word "tessa" and the telestic word "dessa" aligned perfectly with one another and on the same line that contains the date of Osama Bin Laden's death on May 2, 2011.  The words are spelled vertically and they can interchange their letters, zig-zag and spell the same words.  In addition, there is the telestic word "tess" above those previously mentioned words and the word "yen" below.

It would seem there is meaning in this presentation, but I am not making the connection.  The letters are there to spell 'assassinated' but I don't find that kind of rearrangement compelling.

Any help would be appreciated.

Jim Ross

Update:  "Tesa" lacks one letter of being an anagram for "Team" and "Desa" lacks one letter of being an anagram of "Seal." Too close to "Seal Team" to be coincidental, given my low bar, but not close enough to proof that WDG knew about OBL assassination or the date.  I've got to think there's a rational that provides that demonstration.

Update:  The original configuration of 'tesa' and 'desa,' when converted into Luo Clement's (WD Gann pen name IMO) table of numeric values and sum those values, give you a value of 9 for the word 'tesa' and 11 for 'desa:'

Concatenated, we have "9/11."

Now, if we substitute m & l for letters s & d in the words 'tesa' and 'desa' we get "seal team." But where is the '6' to make it "Seal Team 6?" Well, we sum the numbers for both the original spellings and for the adapted anagrams.  We get 2 and 4 which is 6.

Seal team 6

He knew.  I wouldn't use the above as proof because its a bit removed from the simple logic and a bit too reminiscent of the '23 enigma' in how I got to the answer.  But I have that low bar for evidence based on hundreds of hours of study and dozens of more compelling enigma answers that support my conclusion and even, faith, that he knew.

Still looking for more confirmation, but I am satisfied.

Update:  Three meaningful asides.  1. If you take the 15 acrostic letters and 15 telestic numbers in the above MOT insert, you will find that an anagram that can be formed from those letters is "assassinated." 2. You may also notice "sAc" under the acrostic word "tesa" which might be recognized as "Strategic Air Command." 3. Third, OBL was a popular folk hero (near diety) among Muslims...not just an outlier radical as our leaders want us to believe.  If he died on the right side of the MOT via 5/2/2011, who died on the left side in 1853? Zorro or Joaquinn Murrieta Carrillo was assassinated on 7/25/1853 by a special "team" of California Rangers.  Among the large California Mexican contingent in 1853, Carrillo was a folk hero and he became the later fictionalized legend, Zorro.  As had OBL, Carrillo had a large bounty on his head.] 
↧
Search

Extrapolating to imaginary dates

January 18, 2016, 12:32 pm
$
0
0
Why not get really abstract?  With WD Gann's "Map of Time" as derived from "The Tunnel Thru the Air."

First a real date; on May 2, 2011 Osama Bin Laden was assassinated which WD Gann predicted via his Map of Time that is available for download.

Second a projected date; on February 20-24, 2016 the MOT predicts an event will occur which would echo the comparable date found on the left side of the MOT, that being October 17, 1848.  On that later date, a great earthquake hit sparsely populated Marlboro, New Zealand.  As well, the acrostic word "Taito" is found between the two dates (highlighted in purple):


Taito is a special ward of Tokyo which in 1923 was struck by what many characterize as the most destructive earthquake in world history.  The number of deaths was not the greatest in history, 140K as I recall, but the property damage and death toll causes some to so typify it as the most destructive.  
The above combined map details supplemented by other clues (the "Golden Dome of San Francisco and the dust jacket of TTTTA" Dome of the Rock, the citation of the 1906 San Francisco earthquake in the book's first paragraph...) supports a prediction that such an earthquake will strike on about February 20-24, 2016 (let's select 2/22/2016 for conversation) and, likely,  but with less confidence, in San Francisco.

Third, a further projected date; October 19, 2016.  This date has been discussed many times but not so much in the context of the MOT.  It is the subject of a future MOT essay but I'll preview it here.  The MOT ends on June 20, 2016 (the summer solstice); so what happens when the "numbers run out?" The numbers reverse direction and start running in the other direction...its a new MOT cycle of 168 years.

Where does February 22, 2016 fall relative to the June 20, 2016 summer solstice and still further, relative to the date October 19, 2016?  Without drawing the MOT we know this simply by finding the number of days between the two dates and the summer solstice.  February 22 is 119 days before the solstice and October 19 is 121 days after.  [I've admitted a cumulative line error of as many as 3 lines in the MOT which I cannot readily resolve.]

If we drew the MOT for the next 168 year period, we'd find February 22 and October 19 falling on nearly the same line.  And what we project to occur on February 22, and we are soon to know, will be reflected on about October 19.

More on October 19, 2016.  I first encountered this date, at risk of diminishing any of credibility of my own, in watching the movie "Knowing" in which the date of the world's end was that date.  I had used the thought of "Knowing," that a page of numbers was a "Map of something," that the Map correlated the date 9/11/01 to the number of deaths that day to find that same dynamic in a listing of every line in TTTTA that is now called the WD Gann Map of Time.  "Knowing" is where the MOT was conceived.  Wouldn't it therefore be natural to have caution about the date it, in fiction, projected?

Let's consider instances of entirely '23 enigma' coincidence that give October 19 some numerological 'gravitas:'

1.  Take first the simple numbers; 10/19/2016 and, like 09/11/2001, drop the year and the '0' and you get 119 and 911.  October 19 is the inversion or 'opposite' of 911.  Odd.

2.  Take the simple numbers of 10/19/2016 and interpret their theosophic reduction:


Of course, 119 will occur every year on October 19.  This year its different as the theosophic reduction of day, month and year gives us 119 as well.  Again, the opposite of 9/11.

3.  Take the difference in the dates of the world's substantial end in "Knowing" and in another contemporary disaster movie "2012," or 10/19/2009 and 12/21/2012, respectively.  Add that difference of 1,159 days to 12/21/2012 to and you get 2/23/2016:

Based on the above, October 19, 2009 figures prominently in the, purely coincidental relation of two contemporary movies and a date that has been projected for weeks on this blog which has been implicit in the math of the MOT for decades.
4.  Take the certain of the 1929 and 1987 stock market "black" days and extrapolate by exactly half the difference (59 years) between them:
May 2, 2011, February 22, 2016 and October 19, 2016.  How might a purely "23 enigma" extrapolation work with the date of OBL's death mentioned first in this essay?

The right pane above indicates what's already been mentioned, that the 2016 summer solstice perfectly splits the dates of February 22 and October 19 to near equal segments of about 120 days.  
The left pane finds the time interval from May 2, 2011 to October 19, 2016 divided by the time interval from May 2, 2011 to February 22, 2016 to the exponent 4 is 1.667...a number that has some gravitas.

Not done yet.

September 11, 2001, May 2, 2011, February 22, 2016 and October 19, 2016.  This is very deep into the '23 enigma.' The time interval between the beginning of the Osama Bin Laden story, September 11, 2001 to its end (at least for him) on May 2, 2011 then added to that later date....


Half the Bin Laden interval added to the date of his death is rather close to the date an event has been projected for February 21-24, 2016.

*******

All of the above, by itself, means nothing.  However, if nature prefers the dates identified several weeks previously (February 21-24 and October 19, 2016) for an 'event,' it would create a web of time periods that will occupy numerologists and obsessive accountants for as long as they wish to be occupied.

Jim Ross

↧
↧

St. Peter's Flood

January 19, 2016, 3:54 am
$
0
0
Yesterday I received and watched "San Andreas" in very faint expectation it might hold a serendipitous insight as did the movies "Knowing" and "2012." The dates of apocalypse of the latter two movies "triangulated" the date that I've been considering for several weeks now, February 21-24, 2016.  I expected San Andreas to be given a "cute" treatment as was given "2012;" it wasn't.  It was pretty serious when you consider the content.  There wasn't a date in "San Andreas," just an event involving the movement of rock (San Andreas and related faults) and the movement of water (tsunami).

So I studied occurrences of rock and water in WD Gann's "The Tunnel Thru the Air," and kept coming back to the 110-year old Aunt Silly's tale of Claire Douglas and his love, Bernice Mayo.  [You may note the age, 110 years old; the earthquake of 1906 plus 110 is 2016.  You might note my many essays that derived the '110' from Mr. Gann's grave stone measurements.]  Claire Douglas was sent on a business trip by his father to interfere with his relationship with Bernice whereupon Bernice wasted away and would ultimately die.  In her last hours, Bernice imposed on Aunt Silly to row her out to point in the crystal clear Lake Munroe where Bernice' body sank to the lake's depths and was swallowed by a fissure in the rock that opened and closed upon her.  Similarly, the heartbroken Claire Douglass dove into the lake and the fissure opened and closed on him thus uniting the lovers.

Aunt Silly, having witnessed the first of the events that Bernice had predicted, said of Bernice on page 254:

As my search progressed, I wandered, as will often happen at 4am, into the following discussion on page 212-13:

I haven't a clue why WD Gann had Robert Gordon ruminate on the above.  I haven't a clue how I got there this morning but, reflecting on it, I realized that 1335 days is the square of the 365.242 days of the year.  Forgetting the decimal placement, as Mr. Gann often did, we have 365.242^2 = 1334.  Assuming one period of 365 years within 365 periods, I counted back from 2016 to find in 1651 there occurred the St Peter's Flood which killed thousands in the Netherlands and Northern Germany.  These floods were caused by great tidal surges and struck in two waves;  February 22, 1651 and March 4-5, 1651.

In the past several weeks I've identified on the WD Gann "Map of Time" two periods of concern; February 24, 2016 (which could be as early as February 21) and the period March 2-19, 2016.  I find it troubling St Peter's flood dates coincide with the MOT dates.  From the Foreword of TTTTA and the Map of Time:


Moreover, I find it concerning that a search of "rock" finds the tale of the 110-year old Aunt Silly would involve a fissure in the rock, the turbulence of the water and a swallowing.

*******

So many coincidences; serendipity or the "23 enigma?" 


The path I've chosen to follow is troubling in two regards.  It troubles me that what I've read and I've read into WD Gann's great work, TTTTA, predicts troubling events.  More so the latter troubles me that my interpretation may become a distorted end in itself.  Yet, what's the downside to being prepared?  

With that self-observed caution, I'll simply continue to write as I explore and leave it up to you.

San Andreas was a very disturbing movie for me.  In case you are unaware, "the Rock" is the movie's epic hero.

Jim Ross

↧

Mit lyed?

January 20, 2016, 8:56 am
$
0
0
In red highlight, is it "Mitt lied" or is it "MIT lied?" Mitt Romeny or M.I.T.?


Let's let Google search arbitrate by putting into the search "mit lied:"

You can read up on it and try to find Marilee's name in the "Map of Time" using the "finder," yada yada, but that's not the point of Mr. Gann's planting this simple serendipity.  It's such an obvious acrostic/telestic message, "Mit lyed," it attracts our attention to attendant subject matter.  I've looked at that thing for weeks, not knowing... why?  No, its not the narrative.  Its the dates.

On the right side of the Map of Time is the date "2/26/1993," the date of the first World Trade Center attack.  I think that's the crux of it even though on the left side we have the date of the first great Chicago fire.

Mr. Gann wants us to know he not only predicted 9/11 but he knew the first WTC attack would occur.

All these acrostic/telestic messages, predictions of the future, miracles....to what end?  What purpose?

Its proof.

I believe Mr. Gann planted dozens of events of foresight in TTTTA so that the least of us (me) and the most obsessive of us (me) could figure it out.  Proof of foresight derived of knowledge of math and science he found in the Bible; prophecy of the Bible reckoned by its student.  Given that thought as true, it begs the question, why?

Its the predictions that Mr. Gann may have left us which have yet to be 'worked out.'

At some point, additional proof has little incremental value.

Jim Ross


↧

What is a miracle? Perhaps 365^2 X 2 or 2.51X10^778 ?

January 21, 2016, 4:49 am
$
0
0
Now convinced WD Gann predicted several events in the World's immediate future, I feel a responsibility to explain this to my in-laws for their preparation.  Its going to be a tough sell given that the father is a minister and life long accomplished student of the Bible.  The contrast could not be greater; the completely literate being lectured by the entirely ignorant.  I feel the meaning of WD Gann's citation of Mathew 13:57 found on page 69 of "The Tunnel Thru the Air:"


I can't argue on his level of understanding.  I have only my testimony, the first part of which is this.  I've studied a man I believe understood the wisdom and knowledge of the Bible to the extent he made predictions not in the realm of conventional understanding.  That in 1909, without a computer or even a calculator and with an auditor following him around the NYSE floor listing every trade, he entered 288 trades in 25 days with only 22 loss trades; that's a documented statistical miracle.  Do the math; in a random market, this can't happen.  Moreover, I've discovered dozens of miracles of foresight which I have documented for persons also familiar with WD Gann and which may be backtested.  Some may be dismissed as coincidence or error on my part, many cannot.

This first level of testimony of miracles will not help me within my 'house.' The statistics of trading securities will not be meaningful because I'm the only trader.  And the other miracles in TTTTA?  I'm the only one in my family who has read TTTTA.  My family knows my obsession with Mr. Gann's TTTTA and will only see the obsession turned to the "23 enigma;" the truth studied so hard it becomes untruth as Emerson has said.  How do I present a miracle that my 'house' has experienced?

What is a miracle?  When you type the question into Google you get exactly this:


A highly improbable, surprising and welcome event not explicable by natural or scientific laws.

Our 'house' has such an event witnessed not just by me or people with the understanding and ability to research TTTTA; it is witnessed by my daughter and son-in-law.  It's documented HERE.

On Sunday November 15, 2015, in connection with our trip to see him graduate from Naval War College in Rhode Island, my son-in-law detoured and drove me to Green-Wood Cemetery in Brooklyn NY to, for my third visit Mr. Gann's grave.  I'd planned on making that trip for WDG research purposes alone and, I'm sure my family was worried for my safety (they won't tell me that), so they willingly contrived the trip and detour for my benefit.

When we arrived, I had given my daughter some instructions on documenting aspects of some stones and I began examining the stone I believed to be the 13th stone in a triangular configuration that is otherwise comprised of 12 stones.  My son-in-law, an avid fantasy football fan, was standing about 10 feet up the hill (east) from Mr. Gann's stone and was looking down at his cell phone, reading the latest on fantasy football players; planning his Sunday strategy.

As I studied the hypothetical 13th stone, he called me to come up to where he was standing; "You've got to see this" were his exact words.

So I trekked up the hill and we looked at the gravestone that is exactly the first up the hill from Mr. Gann's (perhaps 5 feet separate the stones).  It is the Nevins family stone.  Here is a picture I took to document this what we saw that day:


On that very first stone (the "Nevins," a near anagram of "seven") my son-in-law had seen in this cemetery of perhaps 400,000 gravestones (just a guess as there are nearly 600,000 persons interred at GWC) was inscribed his birth date and that of his wife's, my daughter.  The exact days.  What are the odds of this? That's what I'd ask my brother-in-law, the minister.  That's the miracle.

Again, do the math.  Ed, if there were 365 stones in a graveyard, each with one day of the year on it, what is the probability you'd walk into their midst and place your gaze on the one that had your birth date on it?  Simple, it's 1 divided by 365.  Maybe you birth date is a popular date to die and there are 3 gravestones which you might select that will work.  Still, you're 1 in 120.  Keep it simple and assume a random distribution of death dates.  You toss a coin and there are only 2 outcomes so the probability is 1 divided by 2.  In this case, there are 365 outcomes so its 1 out of 365.

Its far more complicated.  Let's say there are 2 dates on every stone.  How many stones does the cemetery have to have in order to have every combination of two dates in the year?  Again assuming randomness of death dates, I believe the statistical answer is 365 factorial or 365 X 364 X 363 X 362 X ......3 X 2 X 1 = a very large number:


A number that is incomprehensibly large.  It's 2.51 X 10 to the 778th power.  2.51 with 778 zeros behind it.  Maybe I'm wrong about it being a factorial calculation...its still a big number.  Maybe its as small as 365 ^ 2.  365 X 2 would still be 133225 gravestones.  Let's go with that number just to keep this essay somewhat comprehensible (though I believe the factorial solution is the correct one).

Say we have a cemetery with 133225 stones in it and Ed and Linda are at the gate.  Their job is to walk anywhere in the graveyard and, when they feel comfortable, look down at the dates on one and only one gravestone.  What is the probability that they would see both of their dates of birth on that stone?  Not just one, but both.  How many stones would they have to look at to find the 1 out of 133225 that would have both of their birth dates on it?

I really don't care for the answer, whether it is as small as 1 in 266450 or as large as 1 in 2.51X10^778 X 2.51X10^778 (the latter is the joint probability of two events).  The improbability of my son-in-law having seen what he saw, on the first try, that day exceeds imagination.  

It gets more improbable.  Having seen those dates the question popped into my mind, what about the 13th stone.  Is my birth date on it?  What would be the probability of that having just seen the twin dates on the Nevins stone?  So I trekked back down the hill and looked at the hypothetical 13th stone for my birth date and this is what I saw:


I saw the date which every parent most fears; that of their child predeceasing them.  My son passed on that day; September 18, 2007.  And that one stone, out of all those which I'd seen, was sitting off centered from its base.  There wasn't a smudge or chip on it that I could see.  It wasn't tilted.  It was sitting sideways.  I asked my son-in-law, a bull of a man, could we have moved that great stone; no.  What is the probability of that occurrence heaped upon the already vastly improbable twin dates?  The answer is unimportant; I know it all to be vastly improbable.  Sir Arthur Eddington's "Army of Monkeys;" that given all of infinity could not type an exact replica of the Library of Congress.

I understand.  Given any grave stone with a date on it, there's likely a date on it that has some small personal meaning to it.  For example, on the stone above, maybe June 28 that is under Arthur Le Grand's name was the date I lost my first tooth?  I'll let you ponder whether that reaches the meaning of one's birth or the loss of a child in personal importance.  You be the arbiter.  Either you recognize it or you don't.

Among the 12 gravestones on which I've been concentrating, there are maybe 3 that have dates on them.  There are maybe 9 that have only the years, such as that of WD and Sadie Gann's:


*******

I take the above as a miracle that confirms to me the direction of my research into WD Gann's "The Tunnel Thru the Air." I will simply ask my 'house' to believe this last miracle that confirms the many other miracles that I have derived from Mr. Gann's works.  I will ask my "house" to believe my interpretation of Mr. Gann's work.

For those few who read this essay, you haven't a reason to believe the story of the stones because you don't know me or whether I am truthful.  However, I have provided dozens of  vastly improbable events you can 'backtest' as documented in dozens of the most recent (last three months) essays on this blog.  Backtest Mr. Gann's 6th prophecy and 7th prophecy.  Backtest the name of the director of the 2009 movie "Knowing" being found in TTTTA, published in 1927.....  Backtest the proofs of Mr. Gann's knowledge and interpretation of the Bible, his foreknowledge, so that you can have confidence (or otherwise) that he knew.  Ask yourself if such events are, within our understanding, possible.


It shouldn't take a statistician to determine if these things of immense unlikelihood (in my naive finite mathematician's opinion) are possible.  Only you, in your character of intelligence, can discern what is true.

If you confirm then ask yourself, what is the purpose of this proof....these miracles?

Jim Ross
↧
↧

The Big One, part 1, the parent message, "Ring In Fire"

January 21, 2016, 6:10 am
$
0
0
To understand this essay and related essays in this series you should first recall the proposition that WD Gann's foreknowledge encoded into "The Tunnel Thru the Air" of events of our time indicates a great event will occur between February 21-24, 2016 and, less firmly established, it will be an earthquake involving San Francisco.  I've written several essays 'triangulating' these dates which originated with WD Gann's "Map of Time" of which one can download it for free, HERE.  Second, you should read a contemporary synopsis of such an event's likelihood according to present science and its possible damage.  One such article can be found HERE.

The Ring of Fire according to Wikipedia:


Might Mr. Gann had referred to "The Ring of Fire" and, if so, is there any associated narrative of note?  Yes.  From the WD Gann "Map of Time" available for download, we find those words located in 3 distant locations:

Ring or "rng:"



Fire or "fre:"


But where is the preposition "of" to be located?

We have a device called the "Tao device" where Mr. Gann had acrostically encoded the word "Tao" meaning "Path" as the beginning of a phrase.  Using that word and a second word, you can determine the location of where he encoded the third word of the phrase.

Let's suspect such a device as the "Tao device" exists in the phrase "Ring of Fire." The "of" would be located equidistant between "rng" and "fre:"

We expect to find "of" on line 11013, but we don't:


I do not find relief in the above knowing that the MOT could be in error by as much as 3 lines.  In contrast, I see the word "In" spelled only one line removed from the projection as troubling.  I judge the foregoing serendipity to mathematically confirm the integrity and interpretation of the phrase "Ring IN Fire."

Further, read the narratives:
  • "Is there no way to prevent deadly destruction?"
  • "The New York Stock Exchange Closed..."
  • "There was no minimizing the seriousness of the seriousness of the situation."
Now consider a nuance of the "Ring of Fire." The name "Ring of Fire" is static.  It describe a state of being and a set of facts.  "Ring IN Fire" connects the existing "ring" in an active state.  As we know, the 1906 San Francisco earthquake was bad, but the ensuing fires consumed an estimated 80% of the City.  Same with the 1923 Tokyo earthquake, regarded by many as the most destructive in world history.  And in 2011, the Tohoku earthquake was just the beginning...  it continues to 'burn' in the damaged Fukushima nuclear plant.

In this series, I will uncover TTTTA encoding of the "Cascadia" subduction, the San "Andreas" fault, and the "tectonic" plates; all the subjects of the New Yorker article linked above.

The many miraclesdemonstrated by Mr. Gann in TTTTA only establish his ability to 'foresee' in order that we consider his warning of "remarkable events" that will occur in our time.

Jim Ross 








↧

A new meaning of the "Tokyo J-1"; an earthquake warning system

January 21, 2016, 10:22 am
$
0
0
[Follow-up.  J-1 is simply a radio station that, as others do, provides earthquake data as we in the State have radio stations that provide weather and emergency alert.  Still, I got to J-1 via "earthquake J-1." I find that extremely meaningful.  Thanks Danny, my fact checker benefactor.]

Following WD Gann's predictions of inventions such as the cellular phone, military drones, stealth airplanes.... I came upon the thought that the J-1 referred to the German Dernier Do 217 J-1 and posted my findings HERE.  Here's the description in that essay:


I fully expected the J-1 was a component of Mr. Gann's proof of the detail in which he could foresee World War II.  I stand by that.

But I have found another more disturbing possibility (not that the two are mutually exclusive uses by Mr. Gann); Japan's emergency broadcasting system for...earthquakes:


Japan is one of the most earthquake prone areas of the world.  I expect the "J-1" is almost comparable to a weather system report in the U.S.


I believe a thorough review (again) of the occurrences of J-1 is imperative.

Two components of Tokyo J-1.  First, Tokyo is the site of the "most destructive" earthquake of all recorded world history - the 1923 Tokyo or Kanto earthquake.  Second, the J-1 or method by with Japanese are warned of earthquakes, and I'd suspect, tsunami's.

Might a tsunami of great proportion be loosed should an event of the proportion discussed in the New Yorker article occur?

How many times have I Googled "Tokyo J-1" and come up with nothing?  Try "earthquake J-1" and the above is what you get.

Hmmm, well, the Earthquake Early Warning radio channel J-1 wasn't in existence in 1927 when TTTTA was published; how'd Mr. Gann know about it?  I guess you haven't been reading this blog for very long.

Jim Ross
↧

The Big One, part 2, the "child" messages

January 22, 2016, 5:17 am
$
0
0
From the previous essay, we have the "Ring in Fire" and its implications for our near future according to the New Yorker.  We also have from many, many previous essays and the WD Gann "Map of Time," the derivation of the date, February 24, 2016 and, given an allowance between the many calculations of this near same date, a range of February 21-24 for an event of great proportion to occur.  Of lesser but substantial confidence, that event would be an earthquake involving San Francisco.

As a caution, the following acrostic/telestic messages have lesser level of evidence value than the mathematically proven "Ring of Fire." In the latter instance, you have two imperfectly spelled words separated by many lines but confirmed by the similar mathematics of the already proven "Tao device." I have a high level of confidence in the "Ring in Fire"because it is mathematically proven according to the Tao device.  At some point, I'm sure Mr. Gann tired of the mechanics of encoding the devices and adopted a philosophy of "prove one and sprinkle the others." Perhaps he's more diligent than I and did create a confirmation of every message. But he didn't tire, I do.  I'm not going to stress over the smaller or "child words."

Let me restate, the "Ring In Fire" in my thinking is the "parent" which has been proven by math in part 1 of this series.  The remainder messages I'll consider the "children" that are to be assumed as credible though....I'll not stress over finding the proof.  There are three "children" I find from the New Yorker article; Cascadia, tectonic and San Andreas.  There is one "child" I find from the movie "Knowing; it is "Hoover Dam." These children messages color the "Ring In Fire."

Cascadia subduction.  The Cascadia subduction zone is the San Andreas fault on steroids.  It stretches from seven hundred miles off shore of Cape Mendocino (just north of San Francisco) through Oregon and Washington into Canada (see the New Yorker link above for more details).  Where a San Adreas event is handicapped at an estimated max of 8.2 R, a Cascadia subduction event could exceed 9 (the largest is recorded history is 9.5).  Such an event occurs every 243 years or so based on 10,000 years of data, the last such event occurred in 1700.  Its overdue.

Where is "Cascadia" in TTTTA?  One place (I thought I'd found two but cannot find the second this early morning) and its a very weak, IMO, message if at all:


Techtonic plates.  Two instances and I have not searched for "plates" as yet:


Consider above the "J-1" in the context of the preceding essay on the earthquake early warning system and "...the enemy intended to destroy San Francisco very quickly."


Consider in the above the "redoubled" efforts of two men to try to save their country yet they were not in command; higher authorities were in control.

San Andreas.  It's very hidden if valid at all.  I am satisfied "but that's me." You decide.


I don't find "San" but the macro "finder" device queries only a column.  Finding a word using both the acrostic and telestic column is a manual process that I haven't figured out how to program given my very inadequate Excel, database and programming abilities.  I found the above by looking at every page.  I am sure there is a "San" somewhere as I'm equally sure the extra 'a' is an oversight or deliberate intent on Mr. Gann's part to cause us doubt (I prefer the latter interpretation).

I am disappointed that "Andareas" appears beginning on line 6176 which is outside the "Ring In Fire" interval but it does appear on page 160 or the first recognizable iteration of Phi (8/5).  I find it highly meaningful that Robert is considering his 21st birthday with the thought that the shell must be broken before the pearl is realized.  From the hardship comes the learning and faith?  Many philosophical and theological threads might be derived from a San Andreas event and a renewal of faith.  The whole question of could a God of benevolence cause such hardship on those he loves?  Wow, its just too early in the morning for this.

Hoover Dam.  Again, I find one occurrence of "huuu vr""dam" separated by many lines and it is outside the "Ring In Fire" line interval.  But, "it's complicated.  It covers encoding that is far more involved than the ring of fire as I'll explain at the conclusion of this essay.  Here's the first word:

 
Exactly aligned with "Huuu" you have "IDSL" an acronym you find for the first emergence of "DSL," a modern invention of digital technology.  But I digress.  The above is personally meaningful as I, as Robert Gordon and Mr. Gann feared, people will ridicule one who tries to understand things that are not meant (so we believe) to be understood.  Read from the very top of the narrative.  And read "an older hand to guide you." A teacher who knows guiding 'you,' referring both to you the reader and me also a reader of TTTTA.  Mr. Gann, the older hand, teaching us.

So there's "Hoover" where is "Dam?"


"Dam" is separated by approximately 100 lines from "Huuuvr" making the association somewhat debatable.  But, as if to anticipate this objection, we find "watr" nearby.  And not shown above, we find "Sea" only 30 lines below "dam." Note the "lfd" above prospectively referring to "Los Angeles Fire Department" as one might use the letters "LAX" to refer to "Los Angeles Airport."

*******

We have four "child" messages, three of which come from the science found in the New Yorker article and one of which comes from the fictional movie "San Andreas." Their "child" properties are less convincing than the mathematic proof of the "Ring In Fire" but you decide.

We find the first two of the above child messages within the "Ring In Fire" line interval but, uncomfortably, we find two not in that line interval; San Andreas and Hoover Dam.  There's a reason to be found in the fictional movie "San Andreas." Like the movie "Knowing," where Mr. Gann has encoded the director's name (see the essay on"Ryne Douglas Pearson"),  Mr. Gann encoded the name of the fault (San Andreas), the hero first responder ("Ray"), his employer (Los Angeles Fire Department of "lfd" above), his wife (Emma), the child who saw the 'sight' and obeyed (Ollie), Hoover Dam, "watr" and "Sea." These latter encodings are the main players in the movie San Andreas.  I have found the all which will become a further essay with predictive coloring of its own.  If you want to get ahead of the game, was "San Andreas" and search for the above words in TTTTA.  

In sum, the two child messages not found in the "Ring In Fire" are juxtaposed with the encoding of the movie "San Andreas" as opposed to the "Ring In Fire" to combine the two into one meaning; in one we find the "where" and in the other we find the "what".  The "where" is the Pacific Coast, the what is the events of the movie.  The latter was hardly the "cute" movie, as was "2012," that I thought it would be.

The third part of this series will be the "where" which you already "know" but which will become more granular and a map of the afflicted Pacific Coast found in TTTTA.

Jim Ross

   




↧
Search

Three instances of "Dow"

January 22, 2016, 7:45 am
$
0
0
I haven't performed a thorough search of WD Gann's Map of Time (a device derived from "The Tunnel Thru the Air") but I have found three occurrences that are curious.

I find an instance of "Dow" appearing on line 3698, highlighted in yellow, an near the date 3/8/1996:


However the search occurred, I was directed to the NYSE merger with Chicago's Archipelago Exchange to form NYSE Arca on 3/8/2006.  Two initial thoughts; Chicago and options markets.  Not sure where this is going at the moment... but wherever it is, I'll get there.

The second instance is far far more elaborate and convincing on line 10303:


"Dow test" and the date range January 14-21 would seem to have meaning give current market conditions.  Was there a test?  I was an avid trader and formerly kept up with these things.  My purpose in researching TTTTA was first to re discover Mr. Gann's methods of predicting the stock market.  Now, I find myself immersed in his predictions and not abreast of the market.  So, you might consider whether there was recently a test of major support and how it might fit with the above excerpt, if at all.  If it does, when might be the top of the fabled Elliott second wave; perhaps next preceding the predicted event which would occur that week that begins with Sunday February 21?

The third instance is found at line 11877:


The complete destruction of the "...greaty Chicago." I've tried finding typos in TTTTA and found (not that others had not noticed it) a purposeful error in the word "Mammouth" which draws attention to Mr. Gann's "6th prophecy." Again, I noticed the acceptable but divergent spellings of the "Tokyo J-1" versus the "Tokio" which causes me to concentrate on the earthquakes of Tokyo and the early warning system prominently found on the "J-1" radio station.  Likewise, Jonah and Jonas are acceptable spellings as I understand those so better informed of Hebrew.

So, a true misspelling (I'm sure there are others of which I am not aware or I forgot), is a rarity in TTTTA and the "greaty Chicago" causes me to question; an error or a veiled meaning?  I elect the latter.  You decide.

The narrative describes the October 2, 1931 attack on Chicago and its utter destruction.  Real or symbolic?  Are we talking some physical destruction, such as mob violence in this "greatly" troubled city?  

Or, perhaps, are we talking symbolic destruction of the Arca.  As an options trader (for my own and not a book of business), I was blessedly deep, very deep into front month puts on QQQs on exactly September 29, 2008.  I remember the rumors about that time; could the options principles make payment on the value of their written positions at that acceleration point in the market.  Maybe it was a rumor to panic those of us on the then good side of the trade.

Or was it real?  Might the options markets fail with a great panic?  And Chicago, symbolically fail?  If so, in June as found in the far right column of the last insert or October 2, the date Chicago was destroyed.  Or does Chicago continue merrily along?

I don't know.  I simply find the discussion more than a little interesting and a valuable piece of furniture I will store in my attic for future reference.

Jim Ross

↧
↧

The Big One, part 3, Mapping the "Ring In Fire"

January 23, 2016, 7:09 am
$
0
0
I remember my dad instructing me to find the "who, what, where and when" to understand the event and then the "how and why" to understand the cause.  Most, likely, have a similar reflection.  Gurdjieff says to "know" something we need to know what came before and after it, what is above and below it, what it is a part of and what is a part of it....or something like that.  We need to know a lot.  What did Mr. Gann want us to know...presuming, of course, he "knew?"

From the first essay in this series and derived from WD Gann's "The Tunnel Thru the Air," we have the "Ring in Fire" and its implications for our near future speculated upon by the New Yorker; the "what" and the "who." We have the "when," that being February 21-24, 2016, derived in many many essays addressing those dates of concern found in the WD Gann "Map of Time."  The "what" discerned in many essays and particularly, this one, is an earthquake and the "who" would logically be answered as a function of the "where."

The "where." From the second essay of this series, we find acrostic/telestic MOT message indications of the Cascadia subduction fault, the tectonic plates, the San Andreas fault and the Hoover Dam; we have an outline of the "where." This essay will find the a more elaborate "map," as outlined by WD Gann in an important paragraph of "The Tunnel Thru the Air." This essay, then, provides that map of concern.

The geographic map found in TTTTA as suggested by a reader, Danny, along with the acrostics "Abif" and "emsy:"


Danny came upon the above paragraph of interest in the context of following up on the essay, "Einstein's Cat." In that context, the renowned equation "E=MC^2" would appear to have been artfully include above in "emsy." That's how we got to this paragraph.

Most interesting is "abif," connoting Hiram Abif, the architect and manager of building King Solomon's who, according to Masonic allegory (according to my imperfect knowledge of the latter), was confronted by three criminals demanding his secret knowledge and the great knowledge died with him when he refused.  We also find "taw" having Masonic meaning of the triangle and its properties.  And we also find "Tarot" which according to some contains the great ancient numerical meanings handed down by the least of us; Gypsies.  I'll leave those acrostic/telestic messages for your imagination and refinement of my very imperfect characterization.

Suffice it to say, we get to this paragraph with some very strong clues from acrostic/telestic messages.  The paragraph, above, is within the line interval of the "Ring In Fire" as previously defined.  And from the narrative discussion of the theoretical battle lines of the first battle of the fictional Great War we have this visual configuration:


[If we convert the above image to a triangle by connecting San Diego, Brownsville and either Portland or Seattle we have a near isosceles triangle (see the mileages in the first insert above).]

The red lines are battle lines designed by the War Council in the paragraph in the first insert.  Why would Mr. Gann give us battle lines forming a triangle?  One explanation might be that he wanted to enclose the Hoover Dam within the area of concern.  Another might be as stated in that paragraph, "People in Los Angeles and San Francisco were in a state of turmoil.  Thousands were leaving every day....going to the Grand Canyon...." People were fleeing from the coast to safer areas.

The above map shows the key points that you might use to define the San Andreas fault and the Cascadia subduction zone.  Consider if one or the other of events occurs; is the probability of the other occurring enhanced or diminished?  If a San Andreas event of 8R occurred, will it be less likely or more likely a Cascadia subduction event would occur?  And vice versa.  The San Andreas event would be a great shaking and violent destruction.  In slight contrast, the Cascadia event would involve shaking but would also be a massive sinking according to the New Yorker article:


The great 1958 Lituya Bay earthquake that spawned a 1720 foot high tsunami was the result of the collapse of a large ledge and massive displacement water with stone.  Consider a ledge the length of the west coast from Cape Mendocino to and including southern coastal Canada.  Lituya Bay's tsunami would be a ripple in a pond.

Now consider the events of TTTTA.  First there was an attack on the U.S. Fleet off the west coast.  Then there was the attack and devastation of Los Angeles followed by San Francisco.  And then the captures of Portland and Seattle.  Implication; San Andreas activates, LA and SF are devastated, Cascadia is activated and Portland and Seattle are "captured" (line 11271)....as if by water enveloping.

The interval of lines defined by the "Ring In Fire," (line 10067 to 11959), using your imagination, defines the entirety of destruction; from the destruction of the west up to and including the final loss in Chicago in chronological sequence.  Not until the destruction of the "greaty Chicago" (a purposeful misspelling in my opinion), will both the real and symbolic destruction be complete...that's the meaning I reach out of the fictional TTTTA.  The "map" is only that of the physical destruction.

In the immediate aftermath following the surrender of Chicago on about line 11959, the end of the "Ring of Fire," Allied Powers present their terms for surrender.  In their fictional 1932 deliberation, the War Council selected Robert Gordon as "Supreme Commander" and battles from that time forward were won by the U.S.  [Interesting as I've noted before, "Supreme Commander" is a term and rank that was first used in WWII for Dwight Eisenhower; never used before the 1940s in military history.  And yet, Mr. Gann uses it in his 1927 article.  Figure that improbability.]

So much meaning can be drawn from the immediately preceding paragraph; theologically, politically, scientifically...the permutations are far too great to address.  Too controversial and subjective given one's persuasion.  I've given you a view of the "who, what, where and when" but the "how and why" is yours to ponder.

I do believe the questions of "how" and "why" are answered in the many scripture readings that Mr. Gann provides and repeats, as Philo's rules of enigma would advise, so that people will notice.  Inquiring minds would ask, "Why did Mr. Gann include literal Bible passages in a fictional book?  Why would he further waste the space to repeat them, each, at least three times?  What might those repetitions of scripture be?" Ask "why?"

I hope the map encourages people to study the events that could occur and those I have predicted, scratch that, those WD Gann has predicted, scratch that, those that WD Gann says the Bible predicted.  Events that, according to the supposed "science of probability" (an otherwise false God in my new view) set forth in the New Yorker article, are long overdue for occurrence.

As that New Yorker article posed the scenario, the only thing worse than living through those events would be surviving and living in their aftermath.

Jim Ross


↧

...but the sign of the prophet Jonas...

January 24, 2016, 5:33 am
$
0
0
We wake up this morning after a great storm has swept the east coast of the United States:


The much debated page 69 of WD Gann's 1927 "The Tunnel Thru the Air:"


This is the same number, "69" that perfectly predicts the 9/11 tragedy extrapolated from July 4, 1932 (the last battle of the fictional Great War in TTTTA) to September 11, 2001 as recounted in the 6th Prophecy; July 4, 1932 plus 69 years plus 69 days and the opposite of day and night brings you to within 1 minute of Muhammad Ata's flight 11 departing from Logan International Airport (this exact calculation is further explained in the link to the 6th Prophecy and not elaborated here).

Point blank:

  • The Bible and Scriptures are the key to all knowledge,  
  • Ask, seek, find (one of several iterations of Mathew 7:7),
  • A prophet will be without honor in his own house as was Robert Gordon,
  • An evil generation seeks a sign,
  • No sign shall be given but for the sign of Jonas,
  • ....all the power under heaven and earth,
  • "I believe that that is the key to the interpretation of the future." 
Powerful statements.   Twice repeated on this page are "the key" and "...no sign shall be given..."

Recall the Book of Jonah, a great storm tosses the ship carrying the reluctant Prophet Jonas whose divine task is to proclaim judgement on Nineveh.  Adding to his woes, the crew doesn't like his message and casts him overboard where he is engulfed by a whale for 3 days and 3 nights (permutations of which numbers create the digits that comprise number 69) before God encourages the fish to expel Jonas to continue his mission.  Once complete, Nineveh repents and we see the merciful God.  There continue to be issues between Jonah and God.

You might note that the Book of Jonah and the personage of Jonas are spelled differently.  I am told by persons who understand the old languages, there is a nuance that causes and permits the different spellings. 

I don't know what to make of this great record setting storm Jonas which is reportedly affecting 80 million people on the east coast.  Am I supposed to claim the storm Jonas is a sign?  Need I do so beyond the unmistakable implication of this essay and the name itself?

I did not name this storm.

Obviously, the questions; A sign perhaps?  Of what?  I'd say 'do the math' but there isn't a calculator for this.  We have only Emerson/Swednborg's concept of "intellectual character" as your arbiter which has been offered once before on this blog and, at risk of pedantry, is offered again:


Jim Ross
↧

"Tip the hat" - San Andreas - "Perhaps proof of design and proof of foresight"

January 25, 2016, 11:25 am
$
0
0
In reviewing the movie San Andreas, I've come upon an acrostic phrase "Tip the hat" which figured prominently in the movie and is found in WD Gann's "The Tunnel Thru the Air." Unlike thought to be debatable single acrostic/telestic words, multiple phrases comprised of acrostic/telestic words spaced at repeating intervals between the phrase components, such as the "Tao device," prove the author's intentionally encoding that message.  If the phrase is an event yet to occur, then you must deal with the proposition of the author's foresight.  "Tip the hat" displays both; intention and foreknowledge.  But first, the movie and the simple acrostic/telestic words.

The 2015 movie, "San Andreas," has already been cited in terms of its encoding in WD Gann's 1927 "The Tunnel Thru the Air." In that previous essay, we find the words for Hoover Dam and tectonic plates as children messages of the greater message "Ring In Fire." To supplement, and I am not going to provide all of the narratives, we find the following principle characters:

Ray Grimes, the Los Angeles Fire Department first responder, played by the "Rock" Dwayne Johnson, is found on lines 143-146 of the WD Gann Map of Time.  The narrative is not noteworthy.

Emma Grimes, Ray's soon to be ex, can be found at line 2194 as "emah." The narrative is entirely noteworthy as it describes what you visually see when you watch the movie:


Ollie, an early teen who accompanies his brother, Daniel, and meets Blake, Rays daughter, the three of whom wander the apocalyptic San Francisco, trusting that Ray and Emma would save them.  Dan and Blake are not pivot but Ollie is.  Blake displays her knowledge of practical things and there comes a time when the three must make a choice.  They must choose to follow the stream of people walking towards the Bay, or do as Blake says, they must go uphill, against the hordes to find a place where her father, in his helicopter, can save them.  Dan wants to follow the crowd.  Ollie convinces his brother with an argument similar to "You have seen the things she can do, do you follow those who have not shown you these things?" I am reminded of the many exhortations in the Bible of "you have seen these things I have done, go and tell others." I am reminded of the first line of Marie's letter of disappearance "According to your faith, be I unto you" or Mathew 9:29 and others.Ollie can be found as "olie" at line 10518.  The truth from a child perhaps?

Los Angeles Fire Department, the employer of Ray, is one of the first words you see in the movie (its on Rays hard helmet aside his name) and, as if to confirm the finding of Ray's acrostic reflection in TTTTA, we as well find "lfd" as a telestic word at line 2001.  I find the attendant narrative meaningful but that's me:

There's far more in acrostics/telestics that are compelling.  But the above word 'signs' dwarf in comparison to more 'perfect' and objective information.  Three far more important messages.

Tip the Hat

I give this acrostic phrase "Tip the Hat" the separate subsection emphasis comparable to its immense improbability.  Ponder that.  Mr. Gann gives us, in his 1927 "TTTTA, the Rock, Dwayne Johnson's exact words in the 2015 movie, "San Andreas." Mr. Gann gives us those words 3 times separated by a rational mathematic sequence indicating absence of randomness; those phrases were intelligently and intentionally created.  Proof of design and proof of foresight.

Tip the Hat is both a telestic/acrostic phrase that proves the mathematic integrity of the Map of Time using the Tao device.  In short, when we find a marker word such as "TAO" and a suspected target, such as "WAR" then we need to look equidistant from the words to discover "to." Then, we have mathematically proven, amid an infinity of improbability, the intent of the author to create the phrase "Tao to War" or, interpreted "Path to War." The prophecy of 9/11 is thus mathematically proven to have been purposefully encoded into TTTTA.

"Tip the hat" is a dramatic and dangerous helicopter maneuver which Ray performs in the first scene of San Andreas.  A helicopter, in order to insert itself between two cliffs, must radically rock itself, tip itself, to get below an overhanging cliff and between the two peaks.  From there Ray and crew are able to access, by line and winch, an accident victim clinging to a lower perch of the cliff.  

So I said to myself, would Mr. Gann have so encoded that key phrase?  He did; in three places.  The first was easy to find...like 'falling off a cliff' you might say.  First, I find 3 telestic/acrostic occurrences of "tip," 10 occurrences of "the" and 8 occurrences of "hat" on line numbers as follows:
My objective is to find a mathematic rule that will find the "the" between the "Tip" and the "hat." If I do, then I can satisfy myself that Mr. Gann designed this proof and that the proof included his foreknowledge of the movie, San Andreas.  

There are 3 lines where we find "Tip;" 6515, 10874 and 12081.  Either Mr. Gann created a systematic function that "squares up" or extrapolates out those there lines to mathematically create three phrases of "tip the hat" or all that I have studied about Mr. Gann's mathematic approach is untrue.  I know an algorithm will be there.  Its taken me hours, days; I believe the below only scratches the surface.

Line 6515.  The first line was as easy as the latter two lines were...problematic.  I found the first "the" the old fashioned way, I used endpoints of the phrase and looked in between.  Since I suspected Mr. Gann counted lines in ascending fashion, I used the lowest "marker" word on line 6515 and then the lowest target word above line 6515 or 6671 and said to myself, there must be a "the" in between 6515 and 6671.  And there was; it was line 6619.  It was 2/3rds the 156 interval between 6515 and 6671; exactly 2/3rds and it is highlighted in yellow below.  Easy.

Where in the tao device the word "to" was equidistant between "tao" and "war," this altered device is 2/3rds above the marker, "tip" or 1/3rd below the target "hat."


Line 10874.  We have a problem.  If you take the marker line 10874, there aren't any target lines that exceed 10874; the highest was 9812.  I need to find a marker that works in mathematics 2/3rds harmony with the midpoint "the."

So what does this mean?  I interpret it to mean we progress from the marker to the end of the sequence, the last line number 15340, and then "start again" as Mr. Gann told us how to count digits after the digit, 9.  Its circular, we 'start again.' The 2/3rds interval, then, is from the marker to 15340 plus then from the line number of the first "the." That will be 2/3rds of the total interval which we multiply by 3/2 to extrapolate from the original marker to the target.

We have another problem...unlike the first iteration that was perfect and gave us the 2/3rd calculation, there aren't any "expected" line numbers that match the actual line numbers.  The closest we get is the green highlighted 1281 expected line number and the 1210 actual line number which are 71 lines apart (70.5 if you count a decimal).

Let's table line 19874 for the moment and look at the 3rd and last "tip" line 12091.

Line 12091.  It happened again.  Extrapolating each "Tip" and "the" interval by 2/3rds we do not have a match between the expected line and an actual line containing "the." The closest we get is highlighted in blue, a failure by 71 lines, and the next closest we get is highlighted in purple, a failure by 114 lines.

Has the algorithm failed?  Do we have an absence of a system Mr. Gann may have designed to supplement the already recognizable improbability of "Tip the hat" occurring in both 1927 TTTTA and 2015 San Andreas?  Maybe.  Maybe not.  Mr. Gann would, in my mind, never miss such a teachable moment for someone who has worked so hard.

Always looking at the numbers, I'm starting to notice something.  There seems to be some relationships in those remainders 70.5, 71 and 114.  Yes, there is:

It appears we have a progression of remainders.  I don't know what it means.  But I know it isn't random. I have so many more questions regarding every one of those line numbers and their resolution but there simply is not enough time.  The main point; Mr. Gann had an opportunity to design a mathematic system out of the "Tip the hat" encoded phrase that demonstrates both his intent and his foresight... I am satisfied he did.  But that's me.

*******

I believe there is a lot more to the "tip the hat" proof and my intuition tells me it goes to the heart of how time cycles might be mathematically constructed; a progression of exponents.  But that's my imagination and I go down as many (far more) dead ending paths than otherwise.

What is apparent from the whole of the above is the several important words that demonstrate the foresight; that WD Gann saw the emergence of the movie San Andreas and he wanted us to take notice.  The integrity of the "tip of hat" would be only a "tip of the hat" to the detective who solves it or to the one who envisioned it.

In addition to all of the above, I believe Mr. Gann wants us to heed the simple conversation Ollie has with his brother;  "You have seen these things she could do.  We do not need to follow the crowd.  We need to follow her."

Sound familiar? 

Jim Ross










  










↧

A challenge; "Draw me a picture of what the future is going to look like."

January 26, 2016, 6:40 am
$
0
0


"Draw me a picture of what the future is going to look like."

"Maybe it means something, like a map or something."

"I've matched these numbers to the dates to every global disaster of the last 50 years in perfect sequence; earthquakes, fires, tsunamis.  The next number on the chain predicts tomorrow, somewhere on the planet, 81 people are going to die, in some kind of tragedy."

"Systems that find meaning in numbers are a dime a dozen.  Why?  Because people see what they want to see."

"The numbers are a warning."

"What happens when the numbers run out?"


*******

In the movie, "Knowing," we have a perfect "map" of thought laid out which we may follow. 

The plot and evidence.  Fictional Lucinda Embry drew a picture, a map, of numbers that, 50 years later and without theretofore discovery, re-told a trouble astrophysics professor, John Koestler, the great tragic events of those 50 years, and the last 3 events yet to occur.  He proved the numbers to events that had occurred and as those last 3 events occurred.  Entirely fictional but thoughtful.

Ultimately, Professor Koestler could not refute the truth of the Lucinda Embry's map.

WD Gann drew a picture, "Map of Time," or MOT, of the future in his 1927 "The Tunnel Thru the Air" and encoded it into the acrostic/telestic words and into mathematic devices found in "The Tunnel Thru the Air."  The MOT was proven on September 11, 2015 by the same method the Professor proved Lucinda's map.  Many of those encoded words and devices are as clear in intention and content as the perfection of mathematics.  There's an abundance of confirmation and/or collateral messages that create a web of evidence and confound the intellectually honest but otherwise doubtful:
  • the 6th prophecy of 9/11 and the date of and the deaths that day,
  • the 7th prophecy that I would discover and confirm my name and identity in TTTTA,
  • dozens of acrostic/telestic words describing events yet to occur after TTTTA's publication,
  • the name of the author of "Knowing,"Ryne Pearson Douglas, encoded in TTTTA,
  • the perfect math and undeniable foresight of the phrase "Tip the hat,".....
  • even, the simple narrative predictions of the Great Depression and WWII found on page 82.
The miracle in plain sight; can a trader, Mr. Gann, followed by an auditor on the NYSE floor, and without a computer much less an electronic calculator, enter 286 trades in 25 days and incur only 22 losses?  Is that statistically possible under the most generous interpretation of "random walk?"

The challenge.  Any person of math and logic cannot, in Emerson and Swedenborg's concept of "intellectual character," dismiss and avoid the truth of these facts and circumstances as evidence.  Yet, without any consideration, Professor Koestler's presentation of the "map" is rejected by his learned associate as a system not worth a "dime a dozen." Similarly, within minutes of my presentation of the 7th Prophecy, I was attacked as "having lost it." There wasn't time for consideration of the evidence...simply an intellectually bigoted reaction to such an affront of the norm of thinking.

So the challenge to Professor Koestler was, "can these things of so vastly improbable proportions be cast aside without due consideration?" Can a person of "intellectual character" convict without trial?

The evidence in real time.  In a series of events, the Professor experienced in real time the evidence; there was the Gulf oil rig disaster (water), the airplane terrorist disaster (air), the subway attack (land) and, finally, the solar flare (fire).  Fictional of course.

Similarly, we have dates in the WD Gann Map of Time and some varying evidence of their importance, February 21-24, March 2-19, May 9 and October 19 of 2016.  The first of the dates, February 21-24, and more specifically, February 24, and its expected nature, is sourced and documented in many essays.  The remaining dates are not consequential unless the first is "proven by time," as Mr. Gann might say, as true.

That date, February 24 is very consequential to perhaps "one third" of all person in our nation and, perhaps the world, given that a great percentage of all persons live within 50 miles of coastal areas.

Should the predicted events of February 24 prove true, then, as Professor Koestler experienced, all of our perceptions of reality and faith will change.  We will have seen the evidence in real time.

The numbers are a warning.  What happens when the numbers run out?  According to the method I have identified in the WD Gann "Map of Time" I believe we reach the end of the numbers (the 168th year of the MOT cycle) and we "begin again." But that's just a method, not a truth.

Mr. Gann reprises the words of Mark 13:20 and Mathew 24:22 three times in TTTTA:


Personally, I conclude the numbers will start again but not before the tribulation of which they warn.

*******

I've been watching a number I noticed this week.  A bright line in the research I've presented in this blog was my first realization that Mr. Gann intended his work be interpreted as having meaning in our generation; upon the election of the 266th Pope.  As all things in this endeavor, it took weeks or months to understand that spark of imagination and then prove the lengths to which Mr. Gann went to confirm that importance.  The message of the 266th Pope is that TTTTA's encoded messages are meant for our generation....for now.

So, that number I've been following is near an end.  I didn't intend it this way; it just happened.  This essay will my 264th since I started as an ignorant believer in the randomness of all things, mystified at the apparent but in-decodable order of numbers:


I plan a letter, a 265th essay, to my family from the least of its spiritually enlightened which I hope will inspire them to do what is necessary to have removed from the West Coast their loved ones.  I will use it as my guide, when I visit them in their home and try to explain to them my concern.  I will be in hazardous territory, the home of a distinguished minister and in another home of a long studied and dedicated Christian.  Again, I am the least in their company but will do my best.

The last essay, the 266th of this series, I expect to write on about February 25, 2016.  In my former philosophy of life it would be a "how stupid was I to write these things" type of essay.  This time it will follow one of two paths depending on the events or lack of events of February 21-24.  If the events prove true, then the essay will reprise thoughts of beginning again.  If false, I will not accuse myself of the vanity of begin wrong but express the blessing of having been wrong.  I'm forever the better for this journey; I'll be wrong but I won't, as I once naively remarked, be the 'goat.' Either way I'll view the result as "His will be done."

The challenge to you, a person appreciative of the exactness and perfection of numbers, is to consider the evidence.  Its easy for me because I saw a miracle of numbers in real time.  You, on the other hand, haven't that experience.  You do have the mountain of miracles of improbability which I've documented.  If you concentrate on only one, consider the most recent "Tip the hat" which finds both mathematic perfection and foresight confirmed in the movie "San Andreas." Ask yourself, "Can this vastly improbable foresight happen?" Mr. Gann could create the enigma, yes.  Could he, in 1927, foresee the phrase "Tip the Hat" included in the 2015 movie, San Andreas?  "Can this happen?"

And then, what do you do about it?  I offer a thought of how Mr. Gann might respond:


Signs. "No sign shall be given, but the sign of the prophet Jonas."

It has been an honor to have my thoughts considered by persons of intellectual character,

Jim Ross



↧
↧

How

January 29, 2016, 4:02 pm
$
0
0
I'll have to defer the letter to my 'house' because I have discovered, if it all proves out, the most incredible of all findings to date.  I need to mark this date with 1/29/2016 because it was one year and one day ago that I suspected how and then proved that suspicion true regarding how WD Gann would prove that my name was purposefully included in "The Tunnel The the Air." And I conceived this newest and deepest mystery of the acrostic word, "How," one year later, I've near proven it today.  So, I'll post this note to reserve the date which is notable to me.  For the moment, an old encoded phrase I discovered very early on in this journey and the word "HOw" which has for so long haunted me....until now.



"Number is the if and why." But "how?"

This next enigma will not answer the how, but it will prove, in more graphic mathematic detail, that Mr. Gann knew how.

If it proves out, this perceived enigma will be the equivalent of the correlation of 9/11 to the number of deaths that day, many times over.

Jim Ross
↧

Three encoded warning messages, their mathematic proof and their implications for February 2016

February 11, 2016, 7:00 pm
$
0
0
This 266th essay can't wait for a February 25 mea culpa I still hope to write.

Three acrostic/telestic words repeated in WD Gann's "The Tunnel Thru the Air" that I'd often pondered; "ENS,""Red" and "TWS." ENS for "Earthquake Notification Service," Red for "Red Cross" and TWS for "Tsunami Warning System." We all know Red Cross.  ENS is a service associated with the U.S. Geological Service.  And TWS represents the several initiatives to provide early warnings for tsunamis;  perform a search on TWS and Wikipedia for the several such services.

WD Gann used those acrostic and telestic words in "The Tunnel Thru the Air" to persuasively triangulate the 23rd and 24th of February 2016 and predict a great earthquake and tsunami.  But before we look at that triangulation, we need to establish the credibility of the words.

A word or two before the proof of credibility.  There are perhaps 1.3M earthquakes per year.  Thankfully, the vast majority are either very small or are so remote as to be inconsequential or not even noticed.  Mr. Gann give us 20 instances of the word "ENS" with which there are 20 notable....not small...earthquakes.  Another 20 instances of the word "Red" to denote 20 earthquakes.  What is the probability of exactly 20 instances of both Red and ENS?  Designed that way would be my conclusion. And then 17 instances of the word "TWS" to denote tsunamis.  In total, 57 observations.

Now the method to establish the proof.  Every time I found an instance of one of those three encoded words in TTTTA, I took note of the year in the right most column of the WD Gann Map of Time.  Then I searched the Internet for that year and either "earthquake" or "tsunami" to see if there was, indeed, a credible event in that year.  The results are below.  For example, the first instance of "TWS" I found was on line 1674 of the MOT and associated with that line is the year 2007 in the far right.  Here's that citation of "TWS:"


So, I search the Internet for "tsunami" and "2007" and I find the Sumatra earthquake and tsunami occurred on September 12, 2007.

Of course, you will realize Mr. Gann published TTTTA in 1927.  There were some years since then when there simply wasn't a notable event.  But I found an event for all 57 observations.  The tsunamis were problematic as tsunamis seem less rigorously followed than earthquakes; but I found all 17.  He didn't provide an "ENS,""Red," or a "TWS" for which a significant event did not occur.  57 out of 57.

ENS.  There are exactly 20 instances of "ENS" spelled as a telestic word (none are acrostic) found in TTTTA.  All of those instances have associated with them a notable event:


Red.  There are exactly 20 instances of "Red" spelled as a telestic word (none are acrostic) found in TTTTA.  Again, all instances are associated with a notable event:


Ponder the narrative that appears in connection with that last observation on line 13383 above.  I'll provide the exact narrative for context:


"....it is God's plan to teach man a lesson..." It's the thesis of Jonathan Cahn's "The Harbinger" and the prophecy of Isaiah 9:10; judgement and divine anger.  Not until man has learned its lesson will the tribulation end.  In addition to the February 2016 event that is anticipated, there are three later dates of great concern.  But that's a digression.  Back to February 2016 and the last of the three warning messages; "TWS."

TWS.  17 instances of the less frequent tsunami events:


Download the "Map of Time." All the line numbers are above.  A "finder" macro in that spreadsheet lets you check the completeness of the 57 observations.  Test me.

*******

Mr. Gann gives us 20 instances of both"ENS" and "Red" to show there was intent.  Mathematic equivalence beyond coincidence.  An interesting exercise would be to combine those 40 observations with the events found in the movie "Knowing" (see the essay HERE) that Mr. Gann apparently anticipated and encoded in TTTTA and then compare that combined list to the Wikipedia list of the greatest earthquakes of the last 100 years (at least, back to 1932).  I expect you'll find a very high correspondence.

But counting earthquakes and tsunamis is not the point of this exercise.  All the work above establishes the validity of the three words; "ENS,""Red" and "TWS." So, we accept he could foresee the future by whatever means.  For what purpose?

To warn us of the February 2016 event of which I have been speculating for several months.  I have not had evidence of Mr. Gann's clear intention and specific date of the earthquake and tsunami until I performed the above work.  Until now.

The dates I have been watching for an earthquake are February 21-24, 2016.  I can now narrow that to February 23 or 24 based on the above work and the below analysis.  Using our knowledge of the three words, look at the relevant Map of Time lines:


The critical dates, February 23 and 24, are highlighted in yellow and were first considered because on the left side of the MOT we find the mirrored date of the Marlboro, NZ earthquake on 10/17/1848.  We expect a similar event occurring on the left side of the MOT to occur on the right side.

February 23 and 24 are confirmed by all the work that has been done in this essay.  "TWS" is highlighted in green above suggesting the event will spawn a tsunami.   "Red" is highlighted in red suggesting an earthquake.  And "ENS" is highlight in blue suggesting, again, an earthquake.  All three appearing near and surrounding the highlighted and long considered dates of February 23 and 24.

But, while the letters are in close proximity, they are either inverted from the top down order as with "Red" and "TWS" or scrambled as in "ENS." When you think about it, could Mr. Gann have proven the integrity of the three words if he provided those arrangements of letters associated with an event that has not occurred?  I'd be suspicious.  The proof and the prediction cannot be commingled; they need to have a different arrangement.

Now, the above lines span from line 52 to 69.  How do we confine the prediction to exactly line 59? The last letter of the word "ENS" appears on line 52 and there are 7 lines from 52 to 59 (59-52=7).  The last letter of the word "Red" or "d" appears on line 66 and there are 7 lines from 59 to 66 (66-59=7).  Its the "Tao device," a favored mathematic tool of Mr. Gann to prove his intent.

All the attention goes to line 59 and the associated dates;  February 23 and 24, 2016.  I conclude Mr. Gann is warning us that an earthquake attended by a tsunami will occur on one or both (pre shocks/aftershocks) of those days.

And it will not be just another event.  In the flesh color you see the word "Ten," an acrostic that I find meaningfully placed in other areas of TTTTA but I have not explained for lack of time and space.   The intensity scale denoted in Roman numbers has X as the next to the largest of any earthquake studied in this exercise spanning 84 years of earthquakes.  If we are measuring according the moment of magnitude measurement, the largest United States earthquake in history would be the Great Lituya Bay earthquake and "megatsunami of 1958." The related earthquake measured at 7.8 M with an intensity of XI.  The "megatsunami" was 1700 feet high based upon destruction of vegetation on affected shoreline cliffs.

The Lituya Bay event occurred in a sparsely populated area of Alaska.  By comparison, the 1906 San Francisco earthquake was exactly the same intensity; 7.8 M with intensity of XI.  In 1906, San Francisco was far more densely populated than Lituya Bay in 1958.  Well, what do those dynamics look like today?

All of the above does not consider the breadth of the event that might occur.  When we're talking about the 1906 San Francisco earthquake we're limited to the San Andreas fault complex; southern California.  The far bigger elephant in the room is the Cascadia subduction that stretches from about Cape Mendocino up the coast well into Canada and including both Washington and Oregon.  That's the really big picture.  On January 26, 1700, the last occurrence of a Cascadia subduction event, vast portions of the then existing coast dropped by 5 to 8 feet depending on the experts you read.  Where the San Andreas fault has a potential to create an 8.2 M earthquake, the Cascadia subduction's potential is greater and extends further.  Using a "straight line" method of elementary accounting and estimation, the event should occur every 233 or so years.  Such an event, by naive statistics, is now 83 years overdue.

And Mr. Gann saw this, in my opinion.  Already developed is his symbolic "Ring In Fire" that has been previously identified.  That essay gives us the following map of the battle lines as found in the narrative of TTTTA and developed in the link above:


Just follow the western most vectors from Brownsville Texas, to San Diego, to Portland and Seattle.  That's what Mr. Gann may have given us on page 279 encoded as "battle lines."

How big?  Consider a previously cited July 20, 2015 New Yorker article:


Very big.

Consider the spirit of Marie Stanton's letter to Robert Gordon, "AHYM" perhaps?


And if you've tested and believe the miracles that Mr. Gann provided and as developed, painfully, imperfectly, in these many essays, be forewarned.  And once forearmed consider your further responsibility explained on page 83:


That's WD Gann speaking, not me.

Jim Ross

Note added 2/15/2016.  Perhaps the message, "WD Gann predicts the use of WMD in the form of 3 tsunamis on California?" The color coded acrostic/telestic messages should be self explanatory:


Tsunami's only occur with the greatest of earthquakes and three would indicate immense destruction.

↧
Search

Mea Culpa

February 25, 2016, 2:38 am
$
0
0
I was wrong and regret the concern that I have caused many people.  I continue to have faith in the many remarkable proofs that I've seen and will continue to study.

Jim Ross
↧

The first of many errors

February 25, 2016, 4:55 am
$
0
0
The number 15,340 lines is of paramount importance as it represents the days between the beginning of the 168-day MOT period on the day after the summer solstice in 1848 and the end of the period on the summer solstice of 2016 (168 years later).  And, as we recall, the 168-year period is 1/15th of the Biblical Great week.

My rendition of the MOT is off 1 and, maybe, 2 days (because the exact number of days in 168-year periods will vary by 1 day as a remainder related to the inexact solar period of 365.242 days).  Take the ending date of June 19, 2016 minus the beginning date of Jun 22, 1848 and you get 15,359 days.  First, the MOT you see the June 22, 1848 at the top left and June 19, 2016 at the top right:


Now the calculation of days:


If you know the mathematic mechanics of the MOT, you'll understand the implication.

I regret the error which, I expect I will find having been made in the pre 1900 period that Excel does not automatically compute and having made it necessary for me to compute manually.

Jim Ross



↧
↧

A matter of interpretation?

February 28, 2016, 4:05 am
$
0
0
For many months I'd anticipated the later weeks of February, then the days February 21-25, then the two days, February 23 and 24.  And I was wrong.  But that's distinct from WD Gann being wrong.

In considering where I made an error, I cannot dismiss the studies of the acrostic/telestic acronyms and the studies I made of them; "ens,""red," and "two" (highlighted in red in the below insert).  And then their triangulation via the "tao device" on the days February 23 and 24.  I can't dismiss the author of the movie "Knowing" being encoded in TTTTA nor the characters and locations of the movie "San Andreas" being encoded in TTTTA.  There must be a purpose WD Gann identified these things and encoded them into "The Tunnel Thru the Air." Its simply not random.

I'll offer two additional suggested meanings of the 'conflagration' of the above 3 encoded words that occurred between lines 55 and 60 (1) of TTTTA:


Did anything happen on February 23 and 24?  Yes, the largest California earthquake of the year in Wasco CA on February 23 at 4pm.  It was originally reported as a 4.9 by the USGS but was later downgraded to a 4.8.  At 4.9 it was the co-largest in California of the year-to-date, but negligible, if noticed at all, in San Francisco and Los Angeles.  But was it "day one" of six?  The next to the last paragraph of TTTTA:


Did February 23 mark day 1 of a 7-day period in which the 5th day is today?

Alternately, we have found the acrostic encoded word "Taito," the last letter of which appears on line 60, the same day on which we find February 23, 2016.  "Taito" is highlighted in purple in the first insert above.  If you count upward from the final letter, "o," in Taito you arrive at line 55 which is related to the dates, March 4 and March 5, on the far right side of the spreadsheet.

Taito, as it has been suggested, refers to a province in Tokyo which was the site of the most destructive earthquake in history, the 1923 Great Kanto earthquake.

It might be noticed that the "o" of Taito, appearing on cumulative line 60 and chapter line 22 sums to 82 which is the page of TTTTA that refers to the 266th Pope.  It is where I first questioned whether Mr. Gann was speaking to our generation when, apparently, he, chronologically incorrectly, referred to the election of the 266th Pope in connection with St Malachy's prophecies and "remarkable events." Now years after I first noticed this seeming purposeful error, I keep coming back to it.

And you might notice that the first letter of "Taito" on cumulative line 55 and chapter line 17 adds to 72 or the pentagonal element of the circle.

Might I have identified the first day of a 6-part period (6 day or 6 2-day periods)?

Obviously, time proves all things.  I haven't lost faith in the things I've seen in connection with this project and will continue to study.

Jim Ross

(1)  I have added 2 days to the MOT as a result of an error that I identified.  An updated MOT will be posted shortly.










↧

WD Gann's Map of Time Download version 4... and "Chapter XXXIX"

March 6, 2016, 5:33 am
$
0
0
Back to basic research following my most recent failure.  How many times in WD Gann's "The Tunnel Thru the Air" does the author caution us not to give up?

In reflecting on how supposed clues might be misinterpreted to present incorrect though plausible predictions, I did notice 4 errors in previous versions of the MOT.  At least, I interpret the following to be errors in how I enumerated lines found  in WD Gann's "Map of Time" as it was encoded into "The Tunnel Thru the Air:"

  • To accommodate the exact number of days in the 168-year MOT period, an additional line was required (see HERE for an explanation).
  • When comparing the MOT to the first printing text of TTTTA I found on the very first page a horizontal line that suggests a vertical line space should be placed before and after it's occurrence.  In the left portion of the insert below numbered (1) you will see the horizontal line above WD Gann and below the title but you will not see that horizontal line in the shot of the MOT on the right side under (2).  Under item number (3) you will see the revised MOT where there is a horizontal line inserted and a vertical line before and after that horizontal line.
  • Similarly to the foregoing, there is another horizontal line space occurring on the sixth page of the book, that being the copyright page, directly below "by WD Gann." And similarly, I have added that horizontal line to the MOT with a vertical line space before and after that horizontal line.
  • Also on the copyright page of the first printing of TTTTA there is a noticeable space, almost a quarter of the page, between the line "moving pictures and dram" and the line at the bottom of the page "Printed in the United States of America."
The above four errors (errors in my opinion), add 6 lines to TTTTA.  If you will recall, the 168-year MOT period and the narrative line spacing that I have given TTTTA resulted in there being a difference of four lines...the MOT period being 4 lines greater than the number of lines enumerated in TTTTA.  This was discussed, among other perceived errors, HERE.  If you look at the bottom of the attached shot of the last page of the version 3 MOT, you will see that the last printed line of TTTTA is line number 15336, yet the 168-year MOT period requires 15340 lines.  Obviously, to me, there has been an error and the 6 extra lines found above more than offset that 4 line perceived error.


So now we have 2 lines too many.  Well, I've been giving the MOT credit for a line space preceding the title on the cover page.  See the very first insert above under (2) and you will see line 1 does not contain any narrative and line 2 contains the title.  I have removed that first line space under version 4 of the MOT and you can see that under (3) of the first insert.

All of the above explanations are my accountant's need to "reconcile" what I've done for persons' who are serious about evaluating the credibility of the MOT.  I feel it necessary where for most people, likely, it is not.  So, with the above explanations logged, following is version 4 of the MOT:



One last note.  You will notice a new column on the extreme left of the MOT in which there are Roman numerals in bold italics.  This column renumbers every "section" of the book starting with the Cover as section "I," the inside Title Page as section "II"....  You will find that "section XXXIX" falls on the widely puzzling misnumbered "Chapter XXXIX" otherwise known as "Robert Gordon's 7 days." Perhaps Chapter XXXIX is the only properly numbered chapter in TTTTA.....

Much more of the section numbering will be revealed in a forthcoming essay in the planning cue.

Jim Ross




↧

What might be the meaning of the misnumbered Chapter XXXIX? A "clew" perhaps?

March 12, 2016, 6:50 am
$
0
0
As originally enumerated, WD Gann's "The Tunnel Thru the Air" has 36 enumerated chapters.  And as students of this mysterious book will quickly point out, the 34th chapter titled "Robert Gordon's Seven Days" is incorrectly shown as "Chapter XXXIX." Oh really?  Perhaps there's a hidden enumeration, to which I alluded in the previous essay, in which "Chapter XXXIX" is the only properly numbered chapter. In my experience, Mr. Gann does not make such a mistake without it being a clue (or is it "clew," which is context for another essay) for something.

In the previous essay I offered the 4.0 revision of the WD Gann "Map of Time" which is subdivided by logical sections of the book.  The cover is a page, the inside title page is a section, the copyright page is a section, the dedication page is a section and the Foreword pages (2) is a section.  That's 5 sections before Chapter I.  If you re-enumerate Chapter I as Chapter VI you'll find the final chapter currently numbered Chapter XXXVI becomes Chapter XXXXI.  And you'll find the flap of TTTTA, as a section itself, become Chapters XXXXII.  [You can download the MOT file, find my errors, do your own research, replicate my work or refute it at the above link.  Feel free to post errors in the comments section below so we can consider and benefit.]

A couple thoughts on what Mr. Gann might be suggesting if he had intended a re-enumeration of chapters.  I don't think it too much of a stretch to consider Chapter XXXIX as proof that Mr. Gann did intend such a re-enumeration....but that's me.

First thought; forty-two chapters or one quarter of the MOT period of 168 years which, in turn, is one fifteenth of the Biblical Great Week of 2520 years (according to Thomas Troward and "Biblical Prophecy....", 1914).  TTTTA, as I have enumerated every line in the MOT, is 15341 lines long which is 42 years X 365.242.  So, the enumeration of 42 chapters, perhaps, suggests the number of years as well.  And, by applying the concept of doubling and re doubling on page 45 (as in the angle Mr. Gann so promoted as dividing time and space into equal quantities) be get from 42 to 168 years.

Second thought; might the re-numbering of chapters say something in and of itself?  Let's look at two of the most important chapters of the book...two that notably contained a chapter subtitle; Chapter VII or "Future Cycles" and Chapter XXXIX "Robert Gordon's Seven Days." Take each separately.

Chapter VII becomes Chapter XII or 7 becomes 12.  Wow, what I can make of that.  7 and 12 are the reductions of two great philosopher stone numbers on which I've written extensively, John Dee's Monas Hieroglyphica number 252 (or 1/10th of the Biblical Great Week.....) and the sacred number 432, otherwise recognizable as the number of pages in TTTTA when counting the cover, rear flap and all blank pages.  And the ratio of 12 /7 has ancient meaning as well.  But to digress into the mystery of number is premature...its an endless past time I have found.  Perhaps, the renumbering of 7 to 12 is just a method that Mr. Gann uses to tell us that this chapter is of great importance.

Similarly, Chapter XXXIX becomes, well, Chapter XXXIX, because it is the only properly numbered chapter in TTTTA under my line of reasoning in this essay.  In the next to the last paragraph of the Foreword to TTTTA, Mr. Gann tells us point blank that "Robert Gordon's Seven Days" contains meaning which once realized by the reader enables him to overcome his greatest enemy, "Death," and to understand "why Jesus rose on the third day and rested on the seventh day." (Hmmm, Jesus did the first of those things but, who rested on the seventh?)  Now that's some gravitas.

I think the numbering of Chapter XXXIX is just another "clew" to indicate a correct direction in research.  But before I close this "chapter" I'll toot my own horn with a comment that is sure to raise the hackles of venerable WD Gann researchers not given such a honor.  What do we find spelled by an acrostic word in the Chapter VII renumbered Chapter XII?


We find "Jim" or my high school name a friend used to call me to infer a feminine bias to my character (which was wholly inappropriate and incorrect as I consider myself quite 'alpha') "Jimi." Associated with that word is a telestic word "ENS" I've identified as "Earthquake Notification Service." Hmmm, some flashback to an excessive concern on my part?  Or a prediction of my faux pas?  Or maybe.....

And what do we find spelled as an acrostic/telestic zig zag word at the beginning of Chapter XXXIX?


We find "Ross." This time the nearest word spelled is "law." Yes, I believe there is mathematic law spelled out in the resolution of the "Robert Gordon's Seven Days" enigmas and I've done a lot to consider the mathematic relations of space and time in that chapter in many essays I wrote several months ago.  I revisit them from time to time as I have ideas about their application.  

But "ENS" and "Law" are not why I've reprised the above words.  Rather, its just to tweak a nipple of one who'd say "Jimmy, you've really lost it now."  Let them, uncomfortably, say "It's just coincidence." And wake up in the middle of the night thinking about it.  Sweet dreams.  Didn't Mycroft and Sherlock have a saying about coincidence; that the Lord was seldom so lazy.

About my name being there.  I get down when I am wrong so I'm down a lot.  In this project I reach dead ends, make errors and am wrong a lot.  I'd previously found the "Jimi" more than a year ago and it was partly the substance of the "7th prophecy of WD Gann." I had not found the zig zag "Ross" you see above.  In the wake of the great error I made about February 23/24, 2016 (which I was thankfully and blessedly wrong) I was down on my ability to read Mr. Gann's intent.  And that's when I found that zig zag word "Ross." Perhaps something of a needed inspiration?

Next up, I'll ponder a "clew." You might search TTTTA for that word.

This is fun..... sometimes..... when you aren't busy being wrong about what Mr. Gann may have said,

Jim Ross




↧
Viewing all 418 articles
Browse latest View live
Search