Road Trip 2 - June 21, 2015, two corrections and insights

August 2, 2015, 6:22 pm

≫ Next: GPS - "The Land of Beginning Again" and "The Garden of Love"

≪ Previous: GGG: Road trip 2 - Need to "know"

I do not intend on a long post as I drove 7 hours (including parking lot traffic on I 278 in Brooklyn) and 7 hours back (with parking lot traffic at the last toll station on the New Jersey Turnpike).

First correction. Mr. Gann is buried in the lot I numbered as 3, not lot 5:

I will fix the above and reissue it.

Second correction. A scholar on Mr. Gann has kindly informed me that his Brooklyn address was 128 Fenimore Street, not 123. The Brooklyn Daily article that I found was, apparently, a misprint because he has located 128 in several places.

The gentleman interred in #4 as I've numerated and whom I will further research, had placed at the bottom right corner of his gravestone a round marker that read "Endowed" and a four digit number. If there were a coordinated effort to construct this geometry, this may have been an endowment to create the conditions that Green-Wood Cemetery would be required to obey.

There are several other stones that are "above" the apex of the above triangle but they are all obscured by the "Great Tree." For various subjective reasons, I believe they are properly excluded from the group of 12

The stones I have numbered 7, 10 and 12 form a visibly perfect diagonal….they form a visually perfect line.

To the left of the stone I have marked #1 is a stone. I confirmed it is NOT in the line of the next 7 stones along that base line (stones 1-7)that are numbered. And there are other reasons this stone is not a component of the 12.

But the exciting find for me was the last question on my list and involves the "Great Tree" that so rudely obscures the view of Lower Manhattan…the cradle of the birth of is Nation. Given that I'm an accountant, I studied the leaves and bark of the Sycamore before the trip. I believe it is a Sycamore. My next door neighbor, a bit more nature savvy than myself, believes its a Live Oak. He didn't see the trunk which was straight up and not gnarled and gangly. 'Time proves all things'….I'll submit it to others.

That last question was, "are there any stones placed at the foot of the tree to indicate who placed it there." When I wrote the question last week I didn't think there was a snowballs chance. But, in wandering to re find Mr. Gann's lot, I did notice a small tree that had a dedication at the bottom. So I had some hope.

I searched all around the base of the tree and there was nothing. Failing, I decided to get a chip of bark and call it a day. I looked up and that's when I saw it. There was a screw protruding from the bark about 2 inches and a small, simple round tag. Both appeared to be stainless steel but I could only get so close. They were maybe 7 feet off the ground and I'm only 5'7" off the ground. The round tag had written on it:

B19

My first thought was that it was a location in the Cemetery. But there was a square stone nearby that, as others, marked section "T" as I recall. I believe it means "Born 1942." Obviously, that new looking screw (it was a hex insert screw as opposed to a phillips or straight) had been placed there in the contemporary period…say within the last 5 years. Perhaps someone had endowed the Cemetery with a condition that such would occur? Hmmm.

But why 1942? There was a gravestone next to the tree and I think I saw 1942 on it (I wasn't concentrating on that year at that juncture). I'm sure there were several deceased persons of that date that might have planted that tree.

But there was one that is quite notable; Mr. Gann purchase lot 37747 2 days after Sadie H. Gann passed….in 1942.

More to come including pictures.

Jim Ross

↧

GPS - "The Land of Beginning Again" and "The Garden of Love"

August 4, 2015, 7:32 am

≫ Next: GGG - Confirming the boundaries of the GGG "Triple Triangle"

≪ Previous: Road Trip 2 - June 21, 2015, two corrections and insights

Time out from the geometry of the WD Gann Memorial Triangle and the WD Gann Gravestone Geometry. I selfishly focus too much on the work that promises a personally and/or monetary reward…I want to know how Mr. Gann predicted the future…I want to make an obscene amount of money (again, having lost it the first time). But I've studied "The Tunnel Thru the Air" enough at this point to understand the insights will come when the time is ripe and not when I want it to occur. It is with this realization, I am writing this and a couple other posts denominated, as I'd previously mentioned, as "GPS" or "WD Gann's Philosophical Synthesis." If your complete focus on "how Mr. Gann predicted the future" or "how can the secrets of TTTTA make me money", then this and posts prefixed by "GPS" will be irrelevant to you. Just skip them, nothing here for you. I can't skip writing them.

Notably beginning on pages 36 and continuing on page 37, Robert Gordon writes a poem to Marie about beginning again and about a journey through The Garden of Love. I have pondered these inscrutable pages many times and resolved they'd always be a mystery. I figured they'd somehow identify the 'Tree of Life' but could never fit them together in the implied form and nodal points. I was wrong. I did identify on page 37 the "Rose of Charity" or "RC" identifying, as I conjured, Mr. Gann as a Rosicrucian (see the 6th paragraph of the essay found HERE). And 17th century Rosicrucians are said to represent they could predict the future.

According to pages 36, we first enter The Garden of Love from the gate of selfishness. On my first visit to Green-Wood Cemetery (June 21, 2015, the summer solstice), I walked from the road roughly south east up the hill from Border Road searching for Mr. Gann's grave. Ultimately, after a seeming interminable time of searching, I texted my wife to let her know I might be very late in the evening because GWC seemed very poorly arranged relative to the Green-Wood Cemetery map. And when I hit send on my cell I looked up the hill and to the right and there was the stone "Gann." I approached Mr. Gann's gravestone from roughly the south west. I was oblivious to the stones surrounding that of Mr. Gann's. It would be several days before I sensed the "WD Gann Gravestone Geometry." It would be weeks before I understood the philosophical (as I interpret it) arrangement/content of the stones. I do now understand, or believe I understand.

This last Sunday, August 2, 2015, when I revisited GWC I drove on Border Road past the place in GWC where I believed Mr. Gann's grave to be, turned right on Hemlock Avenue and parked under a shade tree. I expected it would be a bit easier to find and access the grave from higher up the hill, walking downward. I walked up the Canna Path (note that a canna is a species of the lilly, the canna lilly), turned right and then, after a surprisingly long time to find the grave, I did find the stone number 5. [You can find a copy of the GWC map HERE.] I had approached the grave from roughly the east / southeast as the Sun was to my back at about 11am. This is very important.

Of course, on this later visit, I was keenly aware of 12 stones that were geometrically arranged for a reason; that they would ultimately create what I envision as a time and space clocklike mechanism. I went about affixing number identifications on each stone and found that Mr. Gann's stone was number 3 rather than number 5 as I'd previously believed from a Google Earth reflection of the 12 stones. The revised Google Earth enumeration of stones is this:

You may recall I'd previously identified point C of the WD Gann Memorial Triangle as Mr. Gann's grave or stone number 5. The above is the actual configuration of the 12 stones as I discovered.

On June 21, 2015, when I was unaware of the other 11 stones, I approached the group of stones from approximately the left most red vector. This approach was up the hill. As a bearing, the rightmost red vector points exactly to the Conde Nast Building at Times Square and is near perfectly North.

On August 2, 2015, I approached the stones from the far bottom right corner or roughly from the south east. I can now verify that as I realize the sun was generally at my back and nearly overhead at 11am.

How I differently I approached the 12 stones on those two trips is important. In the first visit, I was ignorant of the 11 stones other than that of Mr. Gann. In the second case I was aware. I was, on the first visit, seeking some insight that would lead me to Mr. Gann's secrets. In the latter I was filled with a reverence of a possible conspiracy of great men to create a timeless geometry rivaling that of the Great Pyramid. On the first trip I selfishly sought a valuable secret….on the second I'd hoped to simply understand.

And what do we find on pages 36 and 37 of TTTTA? We find that we first enter into the Garden of Love from the Gate of Selfishness and we find that "Imagination" leads us from the wrong path. But then we find that when we approach the Garden from the correct gate, the Gate of Unselfishness, we correctly perceive the Garden of Love. We find many flowers; lilies, perhaps Canna Lillies, and the thornless rose. The Lilly of Faith and the Rose of Charity.

I had to put a number sticker on each of the 12 stones because it was too confusing to otherwise stand amidst them and know my alignment among them. I was there, among many things, to take measurements between the stones, verify alignments, etc. so I had to have good bearing; hence the number stickers. I felt guilt and irreverence for putting stickers on the stones, but it had to be done. I did remove them before leaving. With that admission, following are 12 stones:

You will find a rose, lilly and/or a branch with berries of the hickory tree (I have identified the "Great Tree" as a "Buckeye Hickory" as will be discussed in a later essay) on each of the above 12 stones. Unfortunately, picture 12 was not taken well, but I have another picture that shows that, in the right and left margins, you will find the thornless rose:

So, there you have it. And what is that? You have the 12 stones of the WD Gann Gravestone Geometry sporting either a lilly, rose and/or hickory leaf. I can document that the stone to the right of stone #1 in the GGG does not have any flower on it. The 12 stones in the GGG are unique from other stones in their similarities on their face. It is, in my opinion, the Garden of Love.

And, as detailed in pages 36 and 37, I first entered it from the Gate of Selfishness on June 21 and later on August 2 I entered from the exact opposite direction, through the Gate of Understanding. And, of course, then believing Mr. Gann's stone to be stone #5, I entered at that stone. But it was not Mr. Gann's stone, it was Mr. D'Agostaro's stone. But that is where I "entered".

And what is unique among all 12 stones on stone #5. Please refer to the 12 stones above. Only stone 5 contains this one symbol.

It is a gate…. I entered at the Gate of Understanding that is etched on stone #5.

Another realization. If you are convinced of the relation of the symbology of the 12 stones as am I, you need to consider the perspective of all this. The first lot among the 12 comprising the Garden of Love was purchased in 1932 according to the records of Green-Wood Cemetery. WD Gann published "The Tunnel Thru the Air" in 1927 and, doubtlessly, composed it years before that date. How then, when writing TTTTA, did he know the configuration and nature of the 12 stones?

And one bit of perceived philosophy more. If I have found the Garden of Love, is it The Land of Beginning Again. When I entered from the Gate of Understanding, I entered from the same path as the Sun. Had I found the correct beginning as Mr. Gann said was imperative to success in forecasting? An interesting exercise is to search for each instance of the word "beginning" in TTTTA and read its surrounding context. It would seem there's a secret there….'discern the end from the beginning" perhaps?

How fitting that The Land of Beginning Again is found in a cemetery. How encouraging.

Did I mention? Page 37. We find that every lot number among the 12 lots begins with the two digits, 37. Again, the sign of the Rosicrucian and smallest angle of the Pythagorean 3-4-5 right triangle. Just coincidence no doubt.

Always in a state of amazement, I am,

Jim Ross

↧

GGG - Confirming the boundaries of the GGG "Triple Triangle"

August 5, 2015, 9:28 am

≫ Next: GGG: Is there a 13th stone in WD Gann's Gravestone Geometry?

≪ Previous: GPS - "The Land of Beginning Again" and "The Garden of Love"

The GGG is a triangle comprised of 12 stones, 4 of which define a right triangle that is bisected into two additional right triangles. The distances between the 4 arranged stones has been previously quantified and shown to prove the three right triangles (see HERE). The 12 stones and 4 stones connected by vectors are below:

The 3 triangles are defined by the green, blue and yellow vectors. The two red vectors connect the triple triangle to the Statue of Liberty pier entrance and to the Conde Nast Building at 42nd and Broadway. Those 3 points define the greater right triangle of the WD Gann Memorial Triangle. Stone number 3 marks Mr. Gann's grave.

The above triangle is not, in any respect, representative of the currently available map of the Freemason section of Green-Wood Cemetery (section 129). Here is the portion of section 129 in which we find Mr. Gann's lot (lot number 37747 is circled in red):

When I first viewed that section of GWC in Google Earth, I could identify landmarks (the rows of stones in differing directions), the Great Tree, the border streets that allowed me to find the location of the stones and that of Mr. Gann. I was also looking for a perfectly aligned series of 7 stones that I had noted when I visited the site on June 21, 2015. The triangle appeared to be entirely independent and inconsistent with the GWC layout.

To determine the layout of the location of Mr. Gann's stone relative to the GWC map layout, I revisited GWC on August 2, 2015. I found Mr. Gann's grave was actually stone 3 in the "triple triangle" in the first illustration above. In addition, I took pictures and gathered distance information for each of the 12 stones and several other stones. Following is the Google Earth triple triangle with each stone identified plus 4 stones that define the boundaries of the triangle.

A comparison of the above layout finds most of the stones, above, on the GWC layout. But there isn't any correspondence between their relative location. For example, the stone that should be right of Mr. Gann's is lot number 37732 according to the GWC map. It is not. Lot 37732 is on the left of Mr. Gann's stone. All of the stones are missarranged. The Google Earth shots show there is an arrangement of the stones that is vastly dissimilar to the map.

In addition, there are border stones to the triangle and the 12 aligned stones. Enclosed within the red square above there is a hidden stone that is perfectly aligned with stones 11 and 12. However, both the Great Tree and another small tree/shrub obscure the stone from ariel view. Here is a picture of the back of the stone (lot 37318) that is in the red square:

Standing in front of the stone where the casket is placed, the small tree covers the front of the stone making it near unreadable. The tree is planted a mere 8 or 10 inches from the stone as I recall. The annual maintenance of GWC calls for all locations to be maintained, grass cut and made presentable. This is a prominent dissimilarity of this stone from the otherwise aligned stones 11 and 12.

Enclosed within the yellow square is a stone that precedes the first row of 7 stones and, from the aerial picture, may appear to be aligned with the 7. It is not. I enumerated that stone as number 0 and evaluated its alignment. Here is a picture taken from the side of the stone looking down the line of 7 stones in the front row:

Stone 0, viewed from its right side, is markedly left of the row of 7 stones (the side of stone 1 is the first stone above stone 0). In addition, stone 0 does not have any leafs, flowers or markings on its face except for the persons buried there:

The red and yellow outlined stones discussed above define the left side of the triple triangle. There are stones on the right (see green arrows below) and lower side of the triangle that define those two sides:

Within those borders, we find 12 stones in 3 rows that are aligned and facing Lower Manhattan AND all of which contain a flower, petals or leaves as previously discussed. Those are the 12 stones that are the triple triangle.

Somehow, by someone, these stones have been arranged contrary to the GWC intention or ongoing records. The lots were purchased at different times, as much as 3 decades apart, and there isn't any indication of re burial (there would be some similarity of burial dates as re buried persons are reassigned the later date in the records).

I did not address the question of whether or not there is a 13th stone above stones 11 and 12 and obscured by the tree. It does not appear likely but I cannot rule it out. It will require another trip.

Jim Ross

↧

GGG: Is there a 13th stone in WD Gann's Gravestone Geometry?

August 7, 2015, 7:33 am

≫ Next: GGG: Where would we find the 13th stone? The idealized 13th stone triangle.

≪ Previous: GGG - Confirming the boundaries of the GGG "Triple Triangle"

As I was inspecting the Great Tree with my back to the WD Gann diamond (see HERE), I sensed and saw a large stone perhaps 3 or 4 feet from the trunk of the tree. This stone, I believe, may have been aligned with stones 12, 10 and 7. I also imperfectly recall the stone had a round medallion and perhaps it was the stone medallion that had spelled "Endowed" with a four digit number on it. I know that there was a stone with the word "Endowed" on it but upon inspection of every photo I took that day the medallion's I found only stones numbered 2 and 4 had "Perpetual care" medallions on them.

Is that stone closest the base of the tree the 13th stone? We have the riddle of the 13th tribe and the many speculations. Perhaps the intent of the GGG is to symbolically pose the same question?

Consider the triple triangle formed of stones 1, 5, 7 and 11 (green, blue and yellow vectors):

Stones 10 and 12, at the periphery of the formation are not integral to it. That seems very awkward. It just doesn't seem correct. And stones 7, 10 and 12 are perfectly aligned in a diagonal fashion. I specifically checked that and took a picture to show that alignment:

12, 10 and 7 were in perfect diagonal alignment as I stood behind #12. If only I had looked behind me about 15 feet or so where, specially, the 13th stone would have been located. I believe it is the stone I saw next to the trunk of the tree and which, in my best recollection (which might not be good), is the stone with an endowment medallion.

So what would a greater triangle look like with a 13th stone? I draw it by extending the two vectors formed by stones 5 and 11 and stones 7, 10 and 12 (the light blue vectors):

Their intersection would be where I expect the 13th stone, if it exists, will be situated. Obviously, it would complete a far more understandable greater triangle when you connect stone 1 with the speculated 13th stone. I believe the existence of the stone and an endowment agreement may hold key insights into documenting the WD Gann Gravestone Geometry.

So, not having considered the 13th stone question on either of my first two visits, I am destined to make another trip; a third trip. I must have confirmation one way or the other.

From my home in Virginia Beach, 6.5 hours (theoretically 6 hrs 3 min without traffic, 6 hrs 45 min with traffic per below) to Green-Wood Cemetery and 6.5 hours return home (per Google)…..13 hours of travel.

An interesting take on America as the 13th tribe might be found HERE. And then you might consider Mr. Gann's emphatic admonition at the top of the 130th page (err, 13X10) of "The Tunnel Thru the Air":

Jim Ross

↧

GGG: Where would we find the 13th stone? The idealized 13th stone triangle.

August 8, 2015, 8:18 am

≫ Next: GMT: Eureka!

≪ Previous: GGG: Is there a 13th stone in WD Gann's Gravestone Geometry?

In WD Gann's Gravestone Geometry (GGG) where would we expect (lots of assumptions involved) to find it relative to the other 12?

Here's my first drawing using stone 5 (the "gate of Understanding" as I've speculated) and stone 11. Stones 5 and 11 are two points of the "diamond" of the GGG as demonstrated in a previous essay.

A vector drawn from stone 5 through stone 11 intersects a vector drawn from stone 7 through the centers of stones 10 and 12 will intersect at point 13. Point 13 is a first very approximate position where I would expect to find stone 13…if it exists. Then a vector drawn from stone 1 to point 13. Here is the very rough first approximation of the very outer triangle of 1-7-13.

So what are the side lengths of the first approximation of triangle 1-7-13? Based on Google Earth and measuring from centers of the dies of stones 1 and 7 (and we'd expect stone 13) they are:

The first drawing gives us sides of 626, 680 and 648 inches or an average side length of 651. What self respecting Mason or group of 13 Masons would give us an approximate isosceles triangle? Was the intention an isosceles triangle and what would be its intended dimensions? I'd suggest we look to the one entirely known side which is side 1-7.

What is the length of side 1-7? Presently it is measured at 684 inches based on the centers of the die of each stone. Since the stones are differing dimensions, might this involve subjectivity? What is the extreme edge of the two stones; the left edge of stone 1 and right edge of stone 7 as pictured above? It is darn close to 684 inches depending on how you affix the GPS pin. I gravitated to 684 because divided by 12 inches per foot you have 57 feet and divided by 3 you have 19 yards. 57 and 19 are both familiar numbers in Mr. Gann's cosmology. [Recognizing the limitations of measurements of the WD Gann Memorial Triangle, the angles of that triangle were approximately 34, 56, 90. Perhaps, with better measurements that 56 degree angle would be 57.]

So, piling another assumption on assumptions, heretofore, let's assume the isosceles has a side length of 684 with the next intention of creating the right side originating at the extreme right corner of stone 7 and bisecting the diagonally aligned stones 10 and 12 to arrive 684 inches in that direction at hypothetical point 13.

It then becomes merely a matter of finding the point which satisfies 684 inches from the extreme left of stone 1 and point 13. Here is the perfect isosceles triangle with side lengths of 684 inches/57 feet/ 19 yards given those assumptions:

I have eliminated the busy internal vectors and I have revealed the yellow GPS "pins" that reveal the exact location of the stones. Notice how the GGG sits neatly between the rows of the Cemetery's officially laid out rows….something of a "Valley" as described on pg 37 of "The Tunnel Thru the Air." Notice how estimated point 13 is near the center of the "Great Tree."

The GPS pins at at stones 1 and 7 should be on the extreme left and right edges, respectively. The GPS pin at stone 13 should be the center of that stone. It should be:

From my previous trips I know there to be a stone within a few feet (maybe 3 to 6 feet) from the trunk of the "Great Tree." I believe that stone to have a medallion on it and I know I have seen a medallion with "Endowed" with the 4-digit endowment reference on it.

On Sunday, August 30, 2015 I'll make another trip with the principle purpose to verify that stone, one way or the other. This time, in contrast to the previous two trips, I intend on having a more accurate version of the iPhone compass that will take me to the hundredth of a second of GPS. The onboard compass specifies only the second, so I will have to find a better app to address this.

I will first go to stone 5 which i have otherwise identified as the "GGG Gateway," the correct entrance to the "Vally," and then follow the path laid out on page 37 of TTTTA. I expect to better identify that path or route according to page 37 in a later post.

I'm just not smart enough to visualize and cut to the chase of this perceived exercise. I've gotta take it one step at time, make the errors, back up and start again. Maybe the 3rd time will be the charm. Prove all things to yourself and cling to that which is good.

Jim Ross

↧

GMT: Eureka!

August 10, 2015, 9:17 am

≫ Next: GMT: Introducing and documenting the World Trade Center Tetrahedron

≪ Previous: GGG: Where would we find the 13th stone? The idealized 13th stone triangle.

On my first visit to Green-Wood Cemetery and WD Gann's grave (GG), I had been asked to verify the assertion that his grave was oriented to "overlook" the Lower Manhattan Financial District. But for a "Great Tree" I have discussed elsewhere, it does. Walking back and forth from the grave stone past the Great Tree to locate Lower Manhattan, I sensed there was something more. The Stature of Liberty (SOL) was to the left and I could locate it. 42nd and Broadway (location of the fictional "Mammouth" Building (MB) and the very real Conde Nast Building) was somewhere to the right. I sensed there was a greater meaning which I subsequently identified in Google Earth as WD Gann's Memorial Triangle. Naively I announced my speculation that the meaning could rival of the Great Pyramid. The "GMT:"

As previously discussed, the SOL represents the circle as the Island's shape is elliptical with two rough triangles within it's borders, the Conde Nast Building prominently displays multiple embedded squares forming aligned cubes, and Mr. Gann's grave is a component of the WD Gann Gravestone Geometry….a triangle. Three points to the GMT; the circle, square and triangle.

Three points of the triangle simultaneously separated both by distance and by time. The SOL was dedicated in 1886, MB is center stage in 1932, and WD Gann was buried in 1955. The three points are separated by 23, 46 and 69 years. And the points are separated by 3.80, 5.56 and 6.74 miles. These measurements, approximated by Googe Earth, related to each respective vector are:

If you considered only the distance, you have a right triangle with angles of 90, 54 and 36. [Interesting numerical properties associated with those angles with 54 divided by 36 or 90 divided by either 54 or 36.] If you consider time to be a triangle…well, it wouldn't be one. It would be a straight line…think about it. Use an online calculator if you need.

With just a couple simple manipulations of the above table of numbers, the two geometric forms (the triangle and line) would form a very interesting figure. The manipulations are, 1) convert miles to yards, 2) divide each of those 3 yardage numbers by 82 (as in page 82, 82 Wall Street and multiple other occurrences) to achieve "squaring," and 3) divide distance by time. You thereby arrive at three distantly familiar numbers; 1.188, 2.608 and 6.261. Think about it; you have the 4th root of 2, the square of Phi and twice Pi. Far too close to those values to argue otherwise in my opinion.

[Side note. When you do the conversion…if anyone does…you divide yards by 82 and you get 3 produces; 82, 120 and 144. Forget about time for the moment. A to C in yards divided by 82 is…82. A to B in yards divided by 82 is 120…and B to C is 144. Interesting numbers in Mr. Gann's cosmology by themselves.]

Now think where those numbers are located on the GMT:

A triangle with side lengths of 1.188, 2.608 and 6.261 forms a triangle I say? I think not. Those side lengths violate the axiom that a triangle can be formed only if the sum of any two sides exceeds that of the third. At least in 2 dimensional Euclidian (planar) geometry and, I'm guessing in 3 dimensional non Euclidian geometry. But we are talking about something which we'd not expect to be less than four dimensions… Not just {X, Y and Z} but {X, Y. Z AND T}. Can anyone characterize the properties of a four dimensional triangle? Hasn't been done, can't be done. We're in uncharted territory.

Now consider. Side Pi X 2 is positioned directly across from angle A, the symbolic circle of the SOL. Pi, which defines the perimeter of the circle. And the 4th root of 2 across from angle B symbolically represented by the square and cube of the Conde Nast Building. The 4th root of 2, the number 2 and its root being associated with the length of the diagonal of the 1X1 square. And Phi^2 slightly less recognizable as a property of the triangle. Perhaps the measure of the next iteration of the Kepler triangle…. 1, 1.272, 1.618 and into the 4th dimension with 2.618. Phi^2 across from point C, the WD Gann Gravestone Geometry; the gravestone triangle of 12…or perhaps 13 Freemasons.

This is not coincidence. It is not contrived by Mr. Gann. Rather, it would appear to be mathematical law that he identified. It is the mathematics of the nature of time related to the City of New York. The place of the nation's nativity and the judgement derived therefrom.

Moreover, I believe the properties of the GMT to be at the heart of WD Gann's relation of time and space and his ability to predict the future based upon math, science and the repetition of history.

This I discovered August 8, 2015 (in reduction, 8-8-8).

Jim Ross

↧

GMT: Introducing and documenting the World Trade Center Tetrahedron

August 14, 2015, 6:54 am

≫ Next: GMT: 82, 120 and 144

≪ Previous: GMT: Eureka!

Previously, the WD Gann Memorial Triangle ("GMT") was introduced. It was the result of my standing at the gravestone of Mr. Gann in order to look forward to Lower Manhattan (obscured by the "Great Tree") and realizing that the Statue of Liberty ("SOL") and 42 and Broadway (the fictional "Mammouth Building") were aligned southwest and north. Remember, that realization started with the view of Lower Manhattan.

Plotting Mr. Gann's gravestone, the SOL and 42nd and Broadway in Google Earth demonstrated those geographical plots (an area of land as opposed to a single point) would derive an approximate right triangle. Indeed, if you take the western most point of Liberty Island, southeastern most point of the 4 Times Square Building (Conde Nast Building) and stone 12 of the WD Gann Gravestone Geometry ("GGG") triangle, you get a near perfect 90-55-35 triangle.

An interesting aspect of the GMT is that between those 3 points define BOTH distance and time intervals; simultaneously. Out of those simultaneous measurements I demonstrated that time and distance in the GMT are inversely related. In addition, I demonstrated that the symbolic interpretation of each of the 3 points of the triangle are opposite mathematic representations of the same. To explain, the SOL symbolizes the circle, 42 and Broadway symbolizes the square, and the GGG triangle symbolizes the triangle. The line opposite each point derives a mathematic expression associated with each of those symbols; opposite the circular SOL we have twice the value of Pi, opposite square 42nd Broadway we have the 4th root of 2 and opposite the GGG triangle we have Phi squared (the triangle and growth).

But I started with simply verifying that Mr. Gann's gravestone was "square" Lower Manhattan; so where is Lower Manhattan in this right triangle? What part of Lower Manhattan? If you drew a line from Mr. Gann's gravestone, you would find 82 Wall Street (his last office), the Federal Reserve, the location of where stocks were first traded in the US (the Tontine Coffee House located at the same intersection as 82 Wall Street), the earlier offices of Mr. Gann at 120 Liberty Street and the WTC (near contiguous with 120 Liberty Street). So, what monument of Lower Manhattan makes it clear from Mr. Gann's grave makes it clear you are looking at Lower Manhattan?

Well, with your back to the "squared" gravestone, walk past the great tree. In the summer, there are still some obstructing deciduous trees. Undeterred, you can lean back and forth and you can see Lower Manhattan. You cannot discern 82 Wall Street, the Federal Reserve Building, Wall and Waters Street nor 120 Liberty Street. The first and foremost landmark you see is One World Trade Center.

And the WTC was the subject of the three part "WD Gann's 6th Manifest Prophecy of 9/11" that you can find HERE. That prophecy was derived from acrostic and telestic words I discovered in Mr. Gann's 1927 "The Tunnel Thru the Air" such as ATA, TWA, WTC….in statistically improbable (an understatement) reiterations throughout that book. Oh, there are statistically challenged persons who say "You can make the last letter of each of the 15K lines in TTTTA spell anything you want." And I say, you find idiots even in sohphisticated security analysis; people who will expound on anything without thinking.

But this is where what I call the "World Trade Center Tetrahedron" may provide the final proof. The WTC Tetrahedron is comprised of the 3 points of the GMT and the center point of the WTC block. In Google Earth it is this:

I call it a tetrahedron with the apex at point d, the center of the WTC block. But a tetrahedron is formed by 4 equal triangles. Unfortunately, we are limited to a 2 dimensional presentation of a 3 dimensional (spherical) presentation of an area. So, it does not appear to be a tetrahedron. Moreover, we may be looking at a 2 dimensional representation of a 4 dimensional conceptual "geometry" Mr. Gann identified. Only if we could see the "geometry" in 4 dimensions could we understand it as a tetrahedron. Of course, we can't do that.

We can identify the lengths of every vector above; 3 red vectors and 3 yellow vectors. And we can identify the lengths in BOTH distance and time. Might there be some very elementary similarities? Here are the statistics, including the GPS coordinates of every point. You also need to know the time points. The SOL was dedicated in 1886, 42 and Broadway was the scene of the 1932 "Gigantic Attack on New York City" in Mr. Gann's "The Tunnel Thru the Air," 1955 is the date Mr. Gann passed and 2001 is the date of the WTC attack. If the "statistically challenged" were to find the savvy and inquisitiveness to do so, he can recreate every distance and time interval in this next chart:

There are some remarkable properties of the above table. First, the GMT is optimized as a triangle using the western most point of Liberty Island (A), southeastern most point of 42 and Broadway (B) and stone 12 of the GGG. Using the GMT set of vector distances (A to B, B to C and C to D) you get a near perfect distance right triangle of 90-55-35:

You can also observe, as previously noted, that time and distance are inverse. The longest distance vector of the GMT, namely B to C, has associated with it the smallest time interval. And the shortest distance vector has associated with it the longest time interval? Surely, coincidence….not so fast. [Funny, this is similar to how Bradley Cowan's "Price Time Vectors" work; given a fixed PTV value, you can increase time and decrease distance to arrive at the same PTV value and vice versa. Seems I recall Mr. Bradley, in "Four Dimensional Market Structures and Cycles," asserting the tetrahedral nature of the the Dow which, ultimately, forms cubes.]

You next note the GMT time intervals are 23, 46 and 69 years. 23 years multiplied by 1, 2 and 3. Again, surely coincidence….but the coincidences pile up.

[As a side, try not to ignore the interval of 69, or 3 X 23, is the critical time period separating the final battles of TTTTA and the 9/11/2001 attack. See the 6th Prophecy as referred above.]

Now the second set of vectors constructed by connecting the 3 points of the GMT and the WTC point. We have time intervals of 46, 69 and 115, multiples of 23 and 2, 3 and 5. The time intervals between the red vectors and the yellow vectors are disquietingly similar aren't they?

The time intervals separating all four points are all multiples of 23. And, the multiples 1, 2, 3 and 5, depending on your philosophical view of the number 1, are all prime numbers. And the primary interval, 23, can be theosophically reduced to the number 5 or separated into the numbers 2 and 3 which sum to 5. Whew, lots of coincidences piling up. Seems to be some non randomness or system of numbers/geometry emerging.

One more similarity between the GMT red vector and the WTC yellow vectors. The largest distance marks has the shortest time element. And the smallest distance vector has the largest time element. Check it out on the table above.

Here's the challenge. In or about 1927, the publication date of TTTTA, had Mr. Gann discerned the future 9/11 WTC tragedy based upon the 3 points of the GMT and the unknown laws of the 4th dimension of time? Or perhaps a Euclidian, Descartisian coordinate model that derived a similar solution much as one might use differentials to find a solution?

Jim Ross

Following are some additional documentation which might assist anyone attempting to replicate my work (wishful thinking on my part). First, the points in Google Earth:

And, if you were to connect the 3 yellow vectors as components of a triangle, following would be the measurements:

↧

GMT: 82, 120 and 144

August 22, 2015, 4:22 pm

≫ Next: GMT: Properties of the World Trade Center Tetrahedron

≪ Previous: GMT: Introducing and documenting the World Trade Center Tetrahedron

Most of this is a rehash of previous posts regarding the WD Gann Memorial Triangle (GMT). However, there is a point to be reached.

First recall some important numbers in Mr. Gann's life; 82 Wall Street, his offices for the latter part of his career, 120 Liberty Street his earlier offices in New York, and 144… or the square of 12, a hallmark of Mr. Gann's cosmology. 82, 120 and 144.

Recall the GMT:

And its dual dimensions of space time:

We've previously considered that the three red vectors of the GMT, in time increments, are multiples of 1, 2 and 3 and 23. Or 23 (23X1), 46 (23X2) and 69 (23X3).

Simultaneously, the three red vectors display an inverse function of space time. As we've observed the shortest space or 3.80 miles is associated with the longest time or 69 years and so forth. But otherwise the distances, by themselves, seemed, well, unremarkable.

Not so. I have alluded to "squaring" space and time, space time and explained in words the derivation of sqrt(2), phi and pi from space divided by time. Convert miles to yards, divide yards by the number 82 and the three vectors become the numbers 82, 120 and 144.

In words, 3.80 miles is 6741 yards divided by 82 is 82 and that number divided by 69 is 1.188 when squared is pretty darn close to 1.414 or the hypotenuse of the 1X1 square. That vector, A to C, is opposite point B which is positioned at the southeast corner of the Conde Nast Building at 42nd and Broadway: a building which is visually the square and the cube:

Similarly, vectors A to B and B to C derive mathematic artifacts of the triangle and circle, respectively, and are opposite symbols of their nature, namely the WD Gann gravestone triangle and the Statue of Liberty Island with its apparent circles….there's an essay for that.

Remember page 82 of "The Tunnel Thru the Air;" its cautioning of the 266th Pope, forecast of the onset of the stock market collapse and World War II. Remember the publisher of Luo Clement's "The Ancient Science of Numbers" located at 82 Duane Street. All, interesting coincidence.

All this has been documented before. A little hard to swallow all of it as coincidence.

Here is what I strain to consider. Did Mr. Gann plan his first office to be located at 120 Liberty Street and his last office at 82 Wall Street to correspond the space vectors of the GMT? And his strong preference for the square of 12 or 144? 82, 120 and 144.

The most startling implication for me is when he had the knowledge of the GMT, presuming he did….and, of course, I do. Well, he would have had to have known of the GMT before he opened his 120 Liberty Street Office…. We can date Mr. Gann's 120 Liberty Street offices as being occupied by him by a series of advertisements occurring beginning around May 1909 by OROLO for a market letter (see Romeman's research tying Mr. Gann to the OROLO advertisements and 120 Liberty Street at Gannstudygroup).

In my opinion, Mr. Gann had discovered and applied to mundane affairs (the stock market) his mathematical construct of "space time" (Sir Arthur Eddington's 1920 "Space Time and Gravitation" is presented notably without a comma or hyphen) before 1909. This was about the time Albert Einstein published, in German, his work on special relativity (1905) and general relativity (1916). It wasn't until much later that Einstein's works were translated into and explained in English. And even later, in the 1920s, that Einstein's works were largely accepted in the scientific community.

Perhaps, even later, that Mr. Gann's works in physics will be recognized. Remember that important time number 23? Let's see if there is anything of note on page 23 of TTTTA. Well, perhaps so:

"He" studied physics and higher mathematics. Einstein blue skied the metaphysics much of which would ultimately be proven years and decades later by measurement. If I'm right, Mr. Gann applied the physics of space time to the stock markets decades beforehand.

Jim

↧

GMT: Properties of the World Trade Center Tetrahedron

August 25, 2015, 11:28 am

≫ Next: GMT: The WD Gann Memorial Triangle is an Exponential Progression of Triangle Sides

≪ Previous: GMT: 82, 120 and 144

A fourth point at the center of the quadrangle WTC property added to the WD Gann Memorial Triangle creates the two-dimensional illusion (perceptively, a perspective structure) of a three-dimensional tetrahedron that is referred to as the WTC Tetrahedron:

Reduced to an Excel illustration, the distances between points can be inserted along with time properties which have been associated with each of the points. We then have a Euclidian structure based on Descartisian coordinates which includes time durations between the same points:

Space (distance) and time (duration between points) co-located on the same Euclidian structure. In the WTC Tetrahedron we have X, Y, Z and T; a four-dimensional concept. Further, in each of the four triangles (the larger triangle and the 3 component triangles) space forms a triangle and time forms a straight line. Here are the statistics of the above triangle and 3 component triangles:

The larger triangle, ABC has three vectors whose distance measurements of 5.51. 6.72 and 3.85 sum to 16.08 (roughly the 2^4) and form a triangle whose angles sum to 180*. It is a Euclidian triangle by definition (1). On the other hand, the time durations between the 3 points, if we were to try to construct a triangle of them, cannot be a triangle; any two sides of a triangle must be greater than the third. Rather, sides 46 years plus 23 years equal the third side 69 years; a straight line.

And, as we have noted in previous essays, the space distance and time components of each vector of the GMT or triangle ABC are inversely related. In other words, the longest vector in distance, B to C of 6.72 miles, has the shortest time duration, 23 years. And the shortest space distance vector of 3.85 has the longest time duration of 69 years.

Again, those are previously recognized properties of the GMT. How about the 3 component triangles? Ditto. Check each component triangle. Yes, distances form a triangle, duration forms a straight line. Yes, distance and time are inverse.

Perhaps, no, certainly one observation is simply the geometry of a triangle with any point point, such as point 'd' identified within it necessitates the creation of 3 component triangles measured in distance. But why would we find the same relations noted in the paragraph above when we introduce time duration? That time would be a straight line and distance and duration be consistently inverse?

There are some very interesting numbers that present themselves if you manipulate the distances and durations.

[And there may a very promising implication for parsing time by bisecting each of the 3 triangles with a 90* angle drawn from each of the 3 vectors to point 'd'; and parsing both time and distance, simultaneously, is really what we are after, is it not? Context for more research and a later essay.]

As cameo'd in "The Tunnel Thru the Air" Arthur Conan Doyle might have Sherlock tell us:

"You see, but you don't observe. The distinction is clear."

Jim Ross

(1) The measurements via Google Earth are spherical and non-Euclidean. The actual angles sum to nearly 180.1* rather than 180*. Any spherical non-Euclidean triangle interior angles must sum to greater than 180* and hyperbolic non-Euclidean triangles must sum to less than 180*. Since such a small part of the Earth is represented by this triangle, I will assume away the .1* error and accept the case the triangle is Euclidian.

↧

GMT: The WD Gann Memorial Triangle is an Exponential Progression of Triangle Sides

August 27, 2015, 5:48 am

≫ Next: GMT: The Year 2016 and WD Gann's gravestone; 110, 130 and 240….77 and 53

≪ Previous: GMT: Properties of the World Trade Center Tetrahedron

The Pythagorean 3-4-5 triangles is a well known arithmetic progression sides. It is held in such reverence that secretive societies have held it as a symbol since Hermes Trismegistus….1000s of years. You find angles of the Pythagorean 3-4-5, 53* and 37* as the sign of the Rosicrusian and others. The sides are arranged as follows(1):

The Pythagorean triangle is a cornerstone of Euclidian geometry.

Vastly lesser known is the Kepler triangle named after Johannes Kepler (1):

The side progression of the Kepler triangle is based upon Phi. The Kepler triangle is, as explained HERE, the only expression of the triangle that "squares the circle." As developed in that link, the Kepler triangle is enshrined in the Great Pyramid. You may wish to consider in that link that the Kepler triangle squaring of the circle relates Pi and multiples of two, emblematic of the circle and the square (the hypotenuse is the the square root of two times the side).

Moreover, as mentioned in my previous essays (most prominently HERE), the WD Gann Memorial Triangle points A, B and C, symbolically represent the circle, square and triangles. Point A is the Statue of Liberty Island, itself a ellipse sports numerous circles within it (and appears to be the Tree of Life). Point B is the Conde Nast Building and home of Nasdaq; it is clearly the square and the cube. And Point C is the WD Gann Gravestone Geometry triangle, clearly a triangle of 12 (and perhaps a hidden 13th) gravestones of Masons. The Kepler triangle is prominently represented in the GMT.

The logical question must be posed, we have an arithmetic progression in the Pythagorean Triangle and a geometric profession in the Kepler Triangle; it seems logical that there is a triangle with great importance that has sides of an exponential progression.

The WD Gann Memorial Triangle is, in my finite accountant's thinking, the exponential progression of sides. And if true, the implication would be one step beyond that of the Kepler Triangle. Here is the fully documented GMT:

The math is as terribly simple as it is elegant:

1, 2 and 3, sides of a triangle that represents an exponential progression. [Excuse the .05 error as the likely result of either/or both measurement error (where I placed points) or use of spherical measurement of distance interpreted via Euclidian geometry.]

The implication to which I referred- Where the Pythagorean Triangle defines Euclidean planar geometry and the Kepler Triangle is the only triangle that squares the circle and relates Pi to the sqrt(2), the WD Gann Exponential Triangle is the only structure that will equate or "square" the cubic structure of space and the spherical structure of time….squaring the cube and the sphere. Moreover, does this Exponential Triangle define the "curvature of time?"

I haven't tested that implication and I am not equipped to do so. Perhaps it already exists in metaphysics and higher math and wasn't taught in my primer for the CPA exam. On the other hand, I am down this road not out of chance. Again, my opinion; Mr. Gann demonstrated this in the 7th Prophecy found HERE. He knew, yet again, in my opinion.

Hanging in the balance might be the ability to relate circular time (duration) and cubic space (distance). That I would propose, without the benefit of a lot of further discovery, was one of Mr. Gann's two great discoveries. The second discovery would lie in the Gann Gravestone Geometry as previously described…. how to relate the aforementioned "curvature of time" to specific entities (institutions and persons) by virtue of their individual vibration. I expect to pose this dilemma to Mr. Gann's pen pals, or pen personas, Luo Clement and the Einstein Essay Prize Editor (see my previous essays).

Jim Ross

(1) From Wikipedia and in public domain

↧

GMT: The Year 2016 and WD Gann's gravestone; 110, 130 and 240….77 and 53

August 29, 2015, 2:46 pm

≫ Next: GMT: 2016 and the first battles of three great wars

≪ Previous: GMT: The WD Gann Memorial Triangle is an Exponential Progression of Triangle Sides

There are many unique features of the year 2016 that might be derived from a comparison of historic events and numbers associated with Mr. Gann's gravestone. Given the current market volatility and the 100% bearish analysts I formerly followed, my natural inclination is to say 2016 will be bad. But that's not what the "coincidence" of numbers that are the subject of this post say. They simply triangulate on 2016 to infer it will be distinctive, perhaps "remarkable" as Mr. Gann may have alluded on page 82 of TTTTA.

On my first visit to Green-Wood Cemetery on June 21, 2015, I had been asked to take measurements of Mr. Gann's gravestone. I thought it a good exercise and did so.

There is a previous essay regarding the particulars of this stone but there are additional thoughts which I realized last night and would be remiss to forget.

The stone measured starting at the top of the base or pedestal is 30 inches tall at the middle (the top is rounded), 30 inches wide and 8 inches deep. 30 X 8 = 240 and 30 X 30 X 8 = 7200. On the face of the stone are the dates of Mr. Gann's life, 1878-1955 (77 years) and Sadie H. Gann's life, 1889-1942 (53 years). Together, Mr. and Sadie Gann's lives were 130 years when added.

I find some disturbing and charming coincidences involving these numbers but will take them in a semblance of perceived order. The first numbers considered are 240 and 130 which derive a third number, their difference or 110. The disturbing side of these numbers is they seem to triangulate on the year 2016. Here's how:

2016 minus 240 1776, the year of the Declaration of Independence and first battle of the Revolutionary War. And where did the first organized battle of the Revolutionary war take place? It is claimed the first organized battle and the largest battle of the Revolutionary War was the Battle of Brooklyn Heights (aka Battle of Long Island and Battle of Brooklyn). Green-Wood Cemetery is cited on memorials at GWC and on its website as being the location of one of the confrontations of that larger, multi-day battle. Point C on the GMT.

2016 minus 130 is 1886, the year in which the Statue of Liberty was dedicated. Point A on the GMT. 1886 was also the year in which the Buttonwood Agreement was signed by 24

2016 minus 110 is 1906, the year in which the Market Panic of 1906/1907 began. During the Panic, the market lost about 50% of its value, then considered great and necessary regulations were placed on banks. In that year the Federal Government was saved from default by a wealthy financier, J.P. Morgan.

We seem to triangulate on the year 2016 as a concern derived from two of the three points on the GMT (the year 1886) and the three numbers currently under inspection. What coincidence might there be if we looked at those pages in "The Tunnel Thru the Air?"

Page 110 finds Robert Gordon reflecting on the forthcoming Great War he projects:

Page 130 has the ominous warning to the United States:

And Page 240 the progress towards the Great War which has begun:

Do the nature of these excerpts attach to the year 2016? Above my pay grade but I find it disturbing.

Now the numbers 77 and 53, the number of years that Mr. Gann and Sadie H. Gann lived. Second thought, while counting back from 2016 units for each of those numbers in years will uncover notable events, I'm not sure there is a common theme that singularly supports the year 2016. And there is more to those two numbers than just triangulating on 2016. I'll treat them, as best I can and to the extent I have not done so in prior essays, in a separate post. They seem very important.

Jim

↧

GMT: 2016 and the first battles of three great wars

August 31, 2015, 6:31 am

≫ Next: Regarding the year 2016; October 19, 2016

≪ Previous: GMT: The Year 2016 and WD Gann's gravestone; 110, 130 and 240….77 and 53

In the previous post, I introduced some numbers that would point to 2016 might be an important year in the history of the US. There isn't any grand theory of physics or reason, simply coincidence for the dubious or a clue from Mr. Gann for the committed. Personally, I don't know what to make of it.

But here's something I noted this morning (which happens to be the anniversary of 83 completed years after the fictional August 30, 1932 "Meeting of the World" prompting me to re-read again the warnings of pages, 82, 83 and 84 of "The Tunnel Thru the Air"):

The first organized battle of the Revolutionary War following the Declaration of Independence occurred 85 years after the first battle of the Civil War at Fort Sumter. The attack on Pearl Harbor occurred 80 years after the attack on Fort Sumter; a difference in the interval of 5 years. From 85 years to 80 years suggesting the next conclusive battle of the next great war would occur 75 years after the 1941 attack or 2016.

In offering this very suspect notation, one needs to draw a bright line drawn regarding when the "first battle" occurs. In the Revolutionary War, there had been battles of Boston, Lexington and Concord but the the Battle of Brooklyn Heights (portions of which was fought on Green-Woods Cemetery) was the first fully organized battle after the Declaration of Independence was adopted. Fort Sumter occurred after years of unrest over the abolitionist position of the Republican Party and after certain southern states adopted formal resolutions seceding from the Union. Fort Sumter seems popularly viewed as the first battle of the Civil War. And Pearl Harbor occurred years after war was ongoing in Europe and despite the Neutrality Act of 1935.

[I again find curious similarity between the dates of the Neutrality Act signed into law by Franklin D. Roosevelt on August 31, 1935, the fictional date of August 30, 1932 and today's date.]

Follow the thread of differences backwards 90 years and you find 1686, the year in which New York and Albany are granted charters by the colonial governor, Thomas Dongan, 2nd Earl of Limerick. Following one period of 95 years backward in time again and you arrive at at 1491, the year before Columbus'"discovery" of America.

Make of all this what you may,

Jim Ross

↧

Regarding the year 2016; October 19, 2016

September 2, 2015, 6:26 am

≫ Next: Square of 9, part 1; "…which prove the fourth dimension in working out market movements."

≪ Previous: GMT: 2016 and the first battles of three great wars

As mentioned in previous posts, 2016 seems to be 'triangulated' from several numbers that may be derived from 'circumstances' associated with WD Gann. All this hubbub about 2016 is entirely collateral to my main research theme; that Mr. Gann identified the scientific basis (physics), means (Euclidian geometry and Descartesian coordinates) and methods (geometry and math) to discern the nature and timing of future events. This post and the others associated with 2016 are simply 'stuff' I found and not based upon any scientific basis that might be associated Mr. Gann's work. As before, consider it as you wish.

On the other hand, the number of items that point to 2016 are many. They are unlike the stupid stuff that I used to write about in the first many posts to this blog….where I found numbers that seemed to coalesce and point to a time and/or a price. They never worked except in retrospect. Rather, the instant 'circumstances' come from my entirely obsessive study of Mr. Gann's "The Tunnel Thru the Air" and suggest to me they have some greater importance; they may have been meaningfully planted by a smart man rather than conjured up by a knuckle dragger such as I. It is entirely possible that this knuckle dragger has imagined the "meaningful planting" just the same as he did those early posts about circumstances of numbers….and is wrong yet again. Or….

With those limitations again set forth, I have found 2016 to be, first, a year of implied importance and have found October 19, 2016 to be a date of concern. I came upon October 19, 2016 not because it was the 29th anniversary of the October 19, 1987 crash. With 2016 already in my mind, I was considering a contemporary fictional work and October 19 was the exact date of a great catastrophe. I will not give the name of that work; it is laughable to me when I consider it without the further circumstances I will provide. Still, I pursued that date simply because of its resonance with previous stock market crashes in 1929 and 1987.

So, how does October 19, 2016 line up with the crashes of 1987 and 1929? Here's the math:

The period from October 24, 1929 to October 19, 1987 was one day short of 58 years. The period from October 19, 1987 to the projected date October 19, 2016 is exactly half that period.

October 19, 2016 will be a Wednesday. [If you search Black Wednesday you'll find George Soros inspired September 16, 1992 crash of the British pound.]

Now to "The Tunnel Thru the Air." There isn't an 'October 19' in TTTTA. However, when I scan the pdf file of the 1st edition TTTTA, the Adobe scan gives me six instances of "October, 1926", "October, 1927", "October, 1927", "October, 1930", "October, 1932," and "October, 1932." Apparently, Adobe ignores the comma and, so, it may be argued there are 6 instances of October 19 in TTTTA if we too ignore the comma.

I didn't check just the literal wording of TTTTA for that date. I checked the acrostic and telestic encoding of TTTTA for the name of the fictional work that led me to that date. Again, I will not give the name or author of the contemporary fictional work. Nevertheless, the exact title of the fictional work is in the literal body of TTTTA exactly 26 times. The last name of the author of the work is in the literal wording of TTTTA exactly 23 times. The middle name of the author is in the literal wording of TTTTA exactly 11 times. The first name of the author does not appear in the literal wording of TTTTA at all. But the first name of the author appears as an encoded acrostic word in TTTTA exactly 1 time. I find, not so much the title being included in TTTTA as disconcerting because it is a simple word. But the author's three worded name is not simple and it is very unique. And all three words, some 18 letters, are found in TTTTA with the exact spelling.

The last 'circumstance' is the nature of the date October 19, 2016 or 10/19/2016. If we use the latter format for the date and the method of viewing the tragic date 09/11/2001 as "911" we arrive at a similar result. Remove the 2016 as was done to arrive at 911 by suppressing the 2001. Then remove the '0' as was done to make 0911, simply 911. This is what you get; 119. The reverse of 911. Remember one of the mechanics of the 6th Prophecy (see HERE); reversing 69 to get 96. The opposites, the transposition…. 911 becomes 119.

But it does not stop there. Theosophic reduction of 10/19/2016:

1-1-9….again, the reverse of 911.

What, of comfort, do we find on page 119 of TTTTA? "All his future happiness was blasted in a moment."

So what might be the nature of October 19, 2016? Is it pure BS as were my first posts in this blog? I'll let you know at least as early as October 20, 2016.

Until then, none of the above comforts me.

Jim Ross

↧

Square of 9, part 1; "…which prove the fourth dimension in working out market movements."

September 6, 2015, 11:56 am

≫ Next: GMT: Space and Time properties of the GMT and the TTTTA Map of SpaceTime

≪ Previous: Regarding the year 2016; October 19, 2016

In writing an essay on the most important statements made by WD Gann I considered this challenging riddle:

What would that look like? So I tried to draw it in Excel.

That wasn't so tough. The biggest problem was, what size do I make the outer circle and the inner circle? So, I recalled my many essays on "Robert Gordon's 7 Days" ("The Tunnel Thru the Air"). RG circumvents the earth which was a 33K mile trip. When you parse that trip , you find he traveled about 18K miles east/west and 18k miles north south. Interesting, 18K miles is the circumference of the earth at about the same parallel as New York City. No, Mr. Noxious Poster, the earth is not 24,901 miles in circumference everywhere. In fact, the earth is not a sphere but a spheroid with slightly flat poles. But I diverge.

What if we considered the outer triangle to be the circumference of the earth at the equator or 25K as viewed from the north pole. That's the blue circle. And the inner green circle is RG's east/west mileage or 18K.

Now draw the outer black square exactly within the outer circle. My gosh, it is almost perfectly encloses the green inner square. There is something very familiar about the outer circle, outer square and inner circle. Where did I see those 3 figures?

Oh well, let's add the inner triangle. Mr. Gann was a Mason so we need a 90* triangle. And, well, two concentric circles. Aha, squaring the circle (1)!!!! Configure the triangle to vertically connect the center of both circles to the outer circle and horizontally connect the center to the inner circle.

[Not so fast Tanto; there is one and only one triangle that squares the circle. It is the Kepler triangle which is a geometric progression with sides of 1, sqrt(Phi) and Phi. A Pythagorean is but a lowly right triangle with an arithmetic progression of 3, 4 and 5.]

Now do the math. The radius of the larger circle/earth at the equator is 3959 and of the RG circumference is 2885. The hypotenuse would be 4808:

Put those 3 numbers, which constitutes the red triangle in the first illustration above, on an Excel spreadsheet and reduce them. I'll cut to the chase, at least, the first chase. 2886 divided by 961 is 3.0, 3959 divided by 961 is 4.1 and 4899 divided by 961 is 5.1.

The triangular relation of earth's equatorial circumference to its circumference at about the 40th parallel is the Pythagorean 3-4-5 triangle.

It would be hard for me to believe Mr. Gann's riddle of the triangle, circles and squares is not intrinsically related to the riddle of "Robert Gordon's 7 Days." But that's me. The noxious poster would say "I read all of Robert Gordon's 7 Days and it is meaningless. It doesn't have any dollar signs anywhere in it. So you can't make a prediction." He's so cute.

Now I remember. The first illustration above looks uncannily like that presented by Bradley Cowan on page 45 of "Four Dimensional Stock Market Cycles and Structures." In it he explains the geometry of the circle and the square defining the doubling of the square, among other things. Really? Page 45 or half the 90* angle of the right triangle and Mr. Gann's hallmark of dividing time. Again I diverge.

So what's Robert Gordon's relation to the fourth dimension and markets as teased? There aren't any dollar signs. Such a powerful argument.

Does the first illustration look like some of the representations of Mr. Gann's legendary "Square of 9?" Yes it does. You have the inner square which would be populated by prices (a proxy for space). You have the inner and outer circle representing time and on which people will mystically place months or days or trading hours. And you have a triangle which people, supposedly with insight, configure as an isosceles or as a right triangle that touches the same outer circle but not the inner circle and the outer circle. Its all random, "I think it should be this way or that way but I don't have a scientific reason."

All that noted, I propose RG's relation to the fourth dimension and markets is this. The dimensions of RG's trip imposed on the "Square of 9" shows a relation between time at the 40th parallel - where markets trade in NYC - and the equator - where terrestrial time is defined. And the circular nature of time on the "Square of 9" is related to the squareness of space, as represented by market price by the triangle. The triangle, and more pointedly, the Pythagorean triangle defines the inextricable relation of time and space. After all, we know in physics that space and time are so related. We find confirmation of that notion in the current issue of Scientific American which is dedicated to 100 years of Einstein's general relativity. I'd previously read this quote but had to go back and re read several of the articles to find it:

Did I find it on pager 45 as I did the Cowan illustration? No, I found it on page 44…but…page 44 has an indented illustration of "Relativity Primer" which is split with page 45. Page 45 is a subset of page 44 and not an independent page. Just my X-files instinct showing itself.

This is where it gets really interesting. Einstein proved to himself that his equations and theory was correct when in 1915 he applied them to the astrophysics problem of Mercury's perihelion drift. In 100 years, Newton's laws would miss predicting the orbit of Mercury by 43 seconds. 43 seconds in 100 years, yet, an error is an error. Einstein found his formulaic representation of general relativity was perfect.

Similarly, I believe that Mr. Gann had proven to himself that the markets were proof of the physics of the fourth dimension. And the correct application of those physics may have been the 'Square of 9.' Of course, I do not know how to correctly use the 'Square of 9' but I know others do not. As Socrates argued in 'The Apology' something along the lines of "I know I am not as wise as the Gods, but I am wiser than other men who believe they are wise. I am wiser because I know what I don't know. They don't." After studying dozens of texts for untold hours, I cannot find any that prove they know the scientific method that might be at work in the 'Square of 9.'

I call this essay part 1 because it is the terrestrial or special relativity application of the 'Square of 9,' It is named thus because it involves the two circles of the equator and Robert Gordon's circle at about the 40th parallel. It relates to the shorter time periods and prediction based on the earth's rotation alone. It involves special relativity because special relativity is concerned with the geometry of spacetime in the absence of differing gravitation or acceleration; the Minkowski space. All of us on the surface of the earth are subject to pretty much the same gravity. Absent our being on a jet or falling from a building, we're not subject to acceleration. The only relative difference between us is our location. Our relative locations do create a difference in special relativity. A person sitting on a park bench at Battery Park is traveling at a speed of approximately 785 miles per hour (the circumference of the earth at the latitude of NYC divided by 24 or 18832 / 24) which a person on the exact equator is traveling at 1037 miles per hour (the circumference at the equator divided by 24 or 24910 / 24).

This part 1 is 1 of 3 because there are two other fundamental applications of the Square of 9 in my estimation. The second would be the general relativity model caused by the moon's gravitation. Since the moon presents the second largest gravitation effect on the surface of earth (by virtue of its proximity despite its diminutive size), it creates the second greatest gravity well. The outer circle would be the moon's cycle and the inner circle would be the earth's rotation….that's my guess.

And part 3 of 3 would be 'Square of 9' model based on the general relativity model of the sun's gravitational effects on the earth. The outer circle would be the sun's period and the inner circle would, again, be the earth's axis. But again, that's a guess at this point.

What is evident to me is, these two distant points in Mr. Gann's writings (that the fourth dimension is proven by market movements and Robert Gordon's 7 days) may well teach the reasoned and scientific working of the 'Square of 9.' Not the mystical "He brought it back from the far east." It also suggests to me, Mr. Gann was fully aware of the nature of both Special Relativity and General Relativity. Not only that, he applied Special Relativity to the stock markets as early as the 1909 Ticker Interview. Remember the stories of his trading…that he had with him only a 'Square of 9 chart' and his ephemeris? He not only knew and understood Relativity, but could apply it to the market…..before Einstein.

I wish I could really cut to the chase and know what the 'Square of 9' meant and how to use it. I don't. But with each new consideration of merit perhaps I get that much closer to knowing. It's a process to use a tired colloquial BS phrase. But its a method not unknown to those chasing an answer:

"Data, data, data. I can't make bricks without clay."

Jim Ross

↧

GMT: Space and Time properties of the GMT and the TTTTA Map of SpaceTime

September 9, 2015, 5:09 am

≫ Next: A very troubling thought concerning 2016, 110 and 84

≪ Previous: Square of 9, part 1; "…which prove the fourth dimension in working out market movements."

Start with the GMT which is a triangle of points A, B and C on the earth's surface forming a "Gann Exponential Triangle" (or "GET"):

Now the concept of Einstein's special relativity declaring space and time as inextricably related (from Scientific American, September 2015, pg 44):

Moreover, the GMT is contrived (alternately, Mr. Gann identified the facts as they already existed) to demonstrate that space and time are inverted. The longest distance leg of the GMT is the shortest time leg and vice versa.

Now, how do we identify the mathematic relation between time and space, at least in the GMT? Two additional concepts of inversion is necessary.

Take the legs of the GMT in distance (e.g. space) and they form 90-55-35 right triangle shown above. Now square the sides of the triangle and you get a straight line:

Side A to B plus side C to A exactly equals side B to C or 30 + 15 = 45. We have a straight line.

Now take time. Time in the GMT might be conceived as a straight line because the time from side A to B plus side B to C is equal to the exact time of side C to A or 46 + 23 = 69. If we take the square root of those sides, the straight line becomes a 90-55-35 right triangle:

Isn't that funny how the triangle of space becomes the straight line and the straight line of time becomes the right triangle? Separated by an exponential operation (squaring distance or taking the square root of time), we have the 90-55-25 right triangle representing BOTH space and time. I have previously named this triangle the WD Gann Exponential Triangle or "GET."

But that is our trouble. We perceive space and time as separate concepts when in reality they "do not have independent existences." They are inverse according to an exponent relation as will be demonstrated below.

But first, one more concept; a Biblical concept of order from page 78 of "The Tunnel Thru the Air:"

There is also the concept of the lesser becoming the greater and the greater becoming the lesser as Jesus descended to our level and we should stride to his greater level.

Space and time respond to an exponent but inversely according to a concept of mathematical order or, perhaps, reciprocity. Put it in one chart of the properties of the GMT and we find that each of the three legs of the GMT ARE EQUAL:

So elegant, so simple. Unifying space and time according to a squaring/root, ordered by the reciprocal of the smallest results in the three sides of the GMT becoming equal. I will not explain it further. Its something you either devote the time to ponder or you won't know it. Some things must be discovered even if laid out before you.

I have advanced (or I think I have) further than the above owing to TTTTA being a map of time. I am working on reconciling that map of space and time to the above mathematics of space and time. I have seen tangible evidence in TTTTA that the above is the guiding principle of TTTTA's map of time.

Still a work in "proving to myself." Once proven, I believe the work will demonstrate not only that Mr. Gann's knowledge predated the discoveries of Albert Einstein, but Mr. Gann had identified the working relations in special relativity that allowed him to predict events including but not limited to the stock market.

Jim Ross

↧

A very troubling thought concerning 2016, 110 and 84

September 9, 2015, 5:49 am

≫ Next: 2016, more "evidence" of trouble ahead

≪ Previous: GMT: Space and Time properties of the GMT and the TTTTA Map of SpaceTime

Recall from the essay found HERE that several time clues may have been left by WD Gann on his gravestone may infer the year 2016 as important. In addition with find on page 82 of "The Tunnel Thru the Air" that Mr. Gann was concerned, intrigued or whatever with the "remarkable events" to follow the election of the 266th Pope. That, of course, occurred in 2013. SO what might the event's that might occur in 2016 presuming that year is properly "triangulated" and Mr. Gann is correct?

So what was the first events of TTTTA which we might suspect of repetition? In the first paragraph, Robert Gordon was born, but there are millions of births daily. Here's the first paragraph of Chapter 1:

1906, the Great San Francisco earthquake. Add 110 years defined by Mr. Gann's gravestone (see above referenced essay) and you have 2016.

Still further, I have discovered that TTTTA may constitute a "Map of Time" that is only days short of an 84 year cycle. For simplicity's sake and to save me from presenting the "Map of Time" before I truly understand it, take the last day of TTTTA, that being August 30, 1932, and add 84 years. By a finer calculation based on the Map as I have defined it, I get June 26-27, 2016. [9/10/15-It should have struck me earlier but the first date given in TTTTA, the date Robert Gordon was born, was June 9, 1906. This is a nearly perfect 84 year period. See the page number of the last TTTTA excerpt below.]

One final consideration. Am I mixing cycles of 110 and 84? No. Space and time according to special relativity are also subject to relative motion. Motion, an aspect of space, affects spacetime. A person in New York and at the 40th parallel travels, relative to the earth's center at a rate of 785 MPH (18832 circumference at the 40th parallel divided by 24). At the equator, a person travels at a rate of 1036 MPH (24901 miles / 24 hours). And at the 37th parallel where we find San Francisco, the rate would be still different. Differing physical locations infer differing time cycles in my current thinking. In New York, a 2016 disaster in San Francisco would create a market disaster. And in 1932, the market formed its great bottom in August 1932. San Francisco and a 110 year cycle (unique to the 37th parallel) between disasters (earthquake disasters). And New York with an 84 year cycle, unique to the 40th parallel, between market disasters (stock market bottoms).

If my (nearly) worst fears are correct, the event would be of Biblical proportions; both in San Francisco and in New York. I checked page 110 of TTTTA and did not find anything of interest. But page 84, a continuation of the prophecies that began on page 82:

These things are not based on math and science of which I have discovered. They are simply following clues that I believe Mr. Gann may have provided. Maybe he didn't.

But it all concerns me.

Jim Ross

↧

2016, more "evidence" of trouble ahead

September 10, 2015, 8:02 am

≫ Next: WD Gann predicted and commemorated the September 11, 2001 attacks in his "Map of Time"

≪ Previous: A very troubling thought concerning 2016, 110 and 84

If all this nonsense about 2016 is other than circumstance and delusion, then we might consider the magnitude of what might occur in 2016. And possibly a clue to that would be found on page 290 of TTTTA:

Those are the stakes. In 1906, Wikipedia reports 80% of the buildings in San Francisco were destroyed and over 3,000 people lost their lives. Now onto the circumstances presented herein. A couple elements necessary to understanding this post.

First, I have previously offered the thought that "The Tunnel Thru the Air" contains encoded evidence that WD Gann knew when he would die. You can find that essay HERE. If that is true, then he could have computed Sadie Gann's date of death as well.

Next, you should have read the several essays where I offer, based largely on numbers found on Mr. Gann's gravestone and, secondarily, in TTTTA, something of great significance will happen in 2016. You can find these essays HERE, HERE and HERE.

The pile of circumstance mounts and mounts. Here's is today's addition:

Mr. Gann passed 49 years and 62 days after the great 1906 earthquake of San Francisco at an age of 77. And 7 X 7 = 49, but that's only the very thin circumstance that set me off.

I have counted, via Excel, every line of TTTTA on dozens of occasions and continue to revise my counts based on assumptions regarding the number of vacant vertical lines between pages, paragraphs, salutations…etc. But all the counts hover around 15300 lines at this points; 15304 to be exact. Now taking the number of days between the earthquake and Mr. Gann's death divided by the number of lines in TTTTA we have Phi to within .00219.

But the circumstance hardly ends there. Mr. Gann was off by 62 days in his passing having explained the interval from the earthquake to that time. Perhaps Robert Gordon's and other aspects of the gravestone give us that explanation. A suggestion:

Robert Gordon was born on the 53rd day after the earthquake of San Francisco. Sadie Gann passed at an age in her 53rd year. Perhaps the later was a date Mr. Gann may have computed and the former a date he certainly created.

All of which is interesting circumstance in backward dating the earthquake of 1906. So what does that have to do with 2016? That has been explained before but even I, having originated the numbers, forget what I've developed before. So, here it is.

1906 plus 110 year is 2016…. Sadie Gann was 53 years old when she passed and Mr. Gann was 77….a total life span of 130 years. That number deducted from the area of the gravestone (8 inches deep and either 30 inches wide or 30 inches tall) which is 240 gives you a result of 110. Take 1906, be it the date of the earthquake in April 1906 or the date of Robert Gordon's birth in June 1906 (presently I prefer the latter), plus 110 years is 2016.

And all of which presents a lot of circumstance inferring either or both Mr. Gann could "compute" the future and/or his life, and the lives of those around him and in his fiction, are so arranged in a mathematical context as an interwoven "fabric of time."

Circumstance. We may be well advised to heed the words of Arthur Conan Doyle who made two cameo appearances in TTTTA (The Valley of Fear, 1915):

Mere circumstance or computable future reality? For sure, we can wait until 2016 and see.

Jim Ross

↧

WD Gann predicted and commemorated the September 11, 2001 attacks in his "Map of Time"

September 11, 2015, 7:34 am

≫ Next: Variety; 1) The Map of Time, advance and setback 2) Revisiting the improbability of a telestic word of 6 e's

≪ Previous: 2016, more "evidence" of trouble ahead

This is a very difficult post. It is the realization of the "Map of Time" the thought of which I have entertained since discovering the acrostic and telestic encoding within WD Gann's "The Tunnel Thru the Air" several months ago. I could see the signs of markers laid within TTTTA but could not identify the means by which these markers might demonstrate time and event significance. Yesterday, 9/10/2015, I started the research into this suspicion of a map. And yesterday, I came very close to solving the mystery. Today, 9/11/2015, the anniversary of the WTC attacks, I believe I have substantially identified the basic map. The many systems of acrostic/telestic markers remain to be solved, but the primary marker, the date of 9/11/2001 has been identified. The proof will be in this post.

This post is divided into 3 sections. First, for those who are unfamiliar with my conception and proof of "WD Gann's 6th Manifest Prophecy of 9/11" there is provided a short background on those circumstances. This background is important. Second, I will identify the "Map of Time" within TTTTA and its proof; the date of the WTC attack and the number of casualties. And thirdly, I have reconsidered what I discovered and named "The Greatest Triangle in TTTTA" in an elaborate post found HERE. I have re named it "The Twin Triangles of 9/11."

Having, on the summer solstice of this year, visited Mr. Gann's grave, 82 Wall Street, the location of the 110-story Mammouth Building, the Statue of Liberty Island as viewed from Battery Park and the WTC Memorial, this post is the emotional embodiment of hours of work yesterday, last night and this morning. As I complete this post, the ceremony has entered the phase of reading every name of those 2,977 Americans who perished that day. It is incredible to me the timing of this post. I cannot explain the forces that must combine to reach this point at this time. I can only attest that the last two days have happened in this way. I am humbled. I can only wish that the accuracy and clarity of this post can rise to the gravity of the content. I know there are errors and ambiguity, but that's me. I did my best.

BACKGROUND. Integral to this post is "WD Gann's 6th Manifest Prophecy" explained in posts HERE, HERE and HERE. In brief, following are some but not all of the circumstances set forth in those posts.

It begins with the 110-story Mammouth Building as being one's first uncomfortable reflection on whether this building was Mr. Gann's prediction of the 110-story WTC. The intentionally misspelled Mammouth was referred to as "the cedar," and "110-story building" is found in TTTTA 7 times (including those references to the "Cedar" and the "110-story building"). "The Cedar," reminiscent of Rabbi Jonathan Cahn's "The Harbinger" and the prophecy of Isaiah 9:10.

WD Gann cited the terrorist team leader in the 9/11/2001 attacks on the WTC, Muhammad Ata, in no less than 15 repetitions in the acrostic "Ata" in TTTTA. Of 19 terrorists on 4 planes that day, 15 were stationed on the 3 planes that struck the WTC and Pentagon. 15 successful terrorists, 15 repetitions of "Ata."

In the acrostics of TTTTA Mr. Gann named the airline, TWA, some 17 times. Six months before 9/11 was liquidated in bankruptcy and its assets distributed were purchased primarily by American Airlines and, possibly, by United Airlines…the companies whose flights 11 and 175 struck the WTC and flight 77 struck the Pentagon.

Of course, we find the contiguous letters "WTC" (not necessarily in all caps) 5 time in the acrostics of TTTTA.

But the really startling exclamation point is the timing; the "Gigantic Attack on NYC" began exactly 69 years, 69 days and 12 hours before the WTC attack. At 8pm on the night of the "Gigantic Attack" Robert Gordon overheard on the TelTalk the communications of the Allied Enemy that they had departed from their northern, presumably Boston, location to attack the 110-story Mammouth. At 7:59am, American Airlines flight 11 carrying Muhammad Ata departed Boston's Logan airport to attack the 110-story WTC. A difference of one minute from the interval of 69 years and 69 days and the difference of night and day.

The result was as different as night and day. In 1932, the 110-story Mammouth, with a mere two-person defensive force, destroyed the first wave of thousands of Allied enemy planes. In 2001, two planes destroyed the twin towers and thousands of lives. In 1932, the U.S. prevailed, in 2001, the U.S. was defeated. Cycle events that alternate.

So many clues to the 6th Prophecy that can be back tested as they are laid out in the above linked posts.

WD Gann's "Map of Time." So how might Mr. Gann have commemorated the 9/11 attack further? I discovered what I will now recount on 9/10/2015, some 88 years after the publication of TTTTA and 83 years after the fictional "Gigantic Attack on NYC." I expect to complete this post on the 14th anniversary of 9/11 or Mr. Gann's age when he passed, 77 or 7+7=14. If Mr. Gann "planned" this post to occur or "knew" it would occur when it has, he indeed provided us a memorial to the 2,996 persons (2977 civilians and 19 terrorists) who died that day. Following is what I have discovered.

After sitting on the suspicion and personal conviction that TTTTA is a "Map of Time" for many months, I finally began the serious research as I mentioned. I had wrestled with the question of how many lines are in TTTTA for many months. Many assumptions must be made about how many pages there are in TTTTA, how many line spaces are at the beginning of a page, between the header on each page and the first line…. There are markers that 'prove' the arithmetic accuracy of that number of lines, one in the middle of the book (marked by "007") and one at another relevant point (marked by "Phi"). Despite these proofs of the total line length, I continue to wonder about the accuracy of my line determination as it currently stands. As recently as last night I was stuck on 15,304 lines as I have been for several months. But that line length did not 'reconcile' with the placement of the date; 9/11/2001. It was so close, but not exact. The placement of this date, placed there by pure math, not my personal discretion, has become the marker I favor above all others. The numbers had to work.

I have settled on 15,300 lines which is 40 lines short of defining 42 years; 42 X 365.242 = 15,340. And twice that number would be 80 days short of 84 years, the latter being a page number which has a singularly interesting Biblical and market thought expressed thereon:

The lines of TTTTA are a Map of Time, an 84-year period. It is more than one map in that there are acrostic and telestic markers that mark specific lines and associated dates according to the nature of events that are associated with them…but that remains the subject of another post and after much requisite additional research. This section will concern itself with strictly the basic "Map of Time" and the marker proof of 9/11/2001.

The structure of the "Map of Time…." So, we go to the very last line of TTTTA found on the rear dust jacket and that line is line number 15,300:

Provided above is a copy of the last 5 lines of my spreadsheet with the associated narrative, all juxtaposed with a copy of the rear dust jacket of TTTTA. "80 Wall Street, New York" is the last line of TTTTA's dust jacket and line 15300 (blue) on the spreadsheet. To this line and on the right of the spreadsheet is assigned the date, August 30, 1932 (yellow); the last date in TTTTA, the date of the assembly that founds the United Kingdom of the World. From that point upward, I enumerated upward one day per line in the left column and another day in the right column (yellow). There is "appointed" two days for each line. The 15,300, therefore, with two days per line gives us 80 days short of 84 years from the bottom of the spreadsheet to the top. That is the map. Now we need to find dates on the map that may validate its integrity. I will provide one date today as validation; 9/11/2001.

So where do we find the date September 11, 2001? We find it on cumulative line number 2693 and chapter line number 283 (blue). To restate, when reading from the very first and bottom most line on the dust jacket of TTTTA upward and with one line assigned to one line number, we arrive at 9/11/01 on the 2,693rd (blue) line counted from the beginning of the book and the 283rd (blue) line from the beginning of Chapter VI:

We find on 11-Sep-01" (green cell), that the descending line counts are 2693 and 283 or 2,976. This is one life short of the 2,977 non terrorist lives that were lost that day. But when you look at the green boxed "11-Sep-01," it is the right most of the two dates on that line. Reflect back to where this ascending series started; August 30, 1932 was the first number in the series starting at the bottom of the spreadsheet and it is the odd number "1." So too is the green boxed date; it is the odd number of the two dates on that line. 10-Sep-01 is the number 2,976 and 11-Sep-01 is the number 2,977. The date 9/11/2001 and the number of non terrorist lives, 2,977, lost that day. This is a first proof of the integrity of the "Map of Time."

WD Gann's tribute; "The Twin Triangles of 9/11." Why is the acrostic word "TAO" highlighted in red in the last illustration? Because Mr. Gann created from it and two other acrostic words a meaningful message and an isosceles triangle, which divides into two Pythagorean 3-4-5 triangles, to commemorate the 9/11/2001 attack. This message and its symbolic triangles is "The Twin Triangles of 9/11."

The message is "TAO to WAR." Tao, also meaning "path." The phrase is "Path to War". And the word "path" is anchored to the date September 11, 2001. Again, I have identified and examined the triangle created of the three markers (path, to and war) in great detail HERE. In brief, between the three words are two intervals of 80 spaces. The word "to" has 60 horizontal characters and represents the apex of the triangle. Preceding "to" by 80 lines is "TAO" and following "to" by 80 lines is "WAR." That isosceles triangle bisected to form two right triangles will give you….two Pythagorean 3-4-5 right triangles. The right angle is between 80 vertical lines and 60 horizontal characters at the word "to." Reduced, the 80 becomes 4 and the 60 becomes 3. The hypotenuse MUST be 5. On account of this day, I rename these conceptual triangles "WD Gann's Twin Triangles of 9/11." They will exist as long as a copy of the first printing of TTTTA exists.

For the moment, and considering the solemnity of this day, consider the message, "TAO to WAR" and the two Pythagorean 3-4-5 triangles spanning pages 68-71:

It might not go unnoticed to you pages 68-71 span the number that is integral to the 6th prophecy; page 69. Points B and D, the center of the triangles, are on page 69. Ask of an astrologer savvy with the meaning of that page its importance in his craft. Ask a Biblical scholar their importance. Ask yourself:

WD Gann's Twin Triangles of 9/11; twin Pythagorean 3-4-5 triangles, predicting and commemorating the twin towers that fell and those 2,996 lives that ended on September 11, 2001.

He knew, by whatever means, he knew. That seems very sad but, thankfully, not within my ability to understand.

Jim Ross

↧

Variety; 1) The Map of Time, advance and setback 2) Revisiting the improbability of a telestic word of 6 e's

September 12, 2015, 2:01 pm

≫ Next: 2016 and the "Map of Time"

≪ Previous: WD Gann predicted and commemorated the September 11, 2001 attacks in his "Map of Time"

A little brush up in two areas of my research into WD Gann's "The Tunnel Thru the Air."

The "Map of Time" introduced on 9/11/2015 works…. and works better than billed in defining the 9/11/01 attack on the WTC. Revisit first the section of the Map that center on 9/11/2001 but with a modification and an additional column:

The modification is on the first line at the bottom of the spreadsheet (which you can't see). Yesterday's spreadsheet started with just the date 8/2/1932 in the first line from which to count. With that, you have 11-Sep-01 in the very right most column. Today, I have 2 dates on that bottom most line from which we are counting up and, as a result, the 11-Sep-01 lands on the column that is 2nd from the left. Not a big deal, simply working with the mathematic mechanics of the spreadsheet.

But the big deal is the column in which there is a blue highlighted 304. Recall there were 2977 non terrorists who died on 9/11 and, when including the 19 terrorists, there were 2,996 deaths.

Take the cumulative line number counting from the top, which is 2,693, and add the line number counting from the first line of the chapter, which is 283. You get 2,976, one short of the total civilian deaths on 9/11. I rationalized the 1 off yesterday, but will not today.

Now the money shot. Take the same 2,693 counting from the top and add the number of lines counting from the bottom of the chapter which is the blue highlighted 304. You get 2997, exactly one line greater than the total deaths of 2996.

One short and one greater than the actual count. Hmmm. A greater and a lesser. I find that entirely improbable absent the designer's effort to design it that way.

On the downside, I have tried to derive the number of deaths for similar events such as the December 7, 1941 surprise attack on Pearl Harbor. Somewhat close but not close enough to be compelling. I have ideas on altering the structure of the spreadsheet.

The improbability of an telestic of 6 e's. When several months ago I discovered six consecrative e's ending sentences in the Foreword to "The Tunnel Thru the Air," the statistical improbability of such an event was so great as to convince me I should be looking for compelling acrostic words. And it has been incredible.

But I was wrong about that statistical improbability; by a pretty large exponent. The improbability I reckoned, though compelling to me, was vastly understated.

Previously, I defined the probability based on an infinite population of letters and the frequency we would find occurrences of 6 sentences as very very small. And I was throwing in the "infinite population" where TTTTA has a mere 15300 lines and, of those lines, perhaps only 11,000 lines that have a first letter (many lines are blank lines)….a very conservative estimate.

Here's the joint probability analysis according to a finite mathematics CPA. Say we flip a fair coin, err having 2 sides, one heads one tails which is balanced and without any bias. There is a 50% change it will be a hear. The probability is 1 / 2. Our goal is to flip it six times and record six straight heads. The 6-fold "joint probability will be 1.56% or 1.56 in 100.

Anyone wants to flip a coin until you get 6 in a row? How many hours will that take?

So, I incorrectly modeled the 6 e's problem as saying we now have 26 sided fair coin. What would that probability be?

Of course, this model assumes any one every letter in the alphabet has the same probability of being selected when such is not true. "E" is a very popular letter so I've read, as is s, r, d and others. Still, 1.49 in 100 million is a pretty small number even if we have to parse it down for relative popularity of the letter e.

But I was wrong. The 26 letters are not all the characters that might be placed in the first position of a line. There are 10 digits that could be placed there; 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 and 9. That makes 36 possibilities (I'm altogether ignoring punctation marks), not 26. The probability, ignoring relative 'popularity' of letters and numbers would be 1.45 in 10 trillion (if I have my zeros right):

I'll admit that the above isn't correct because I've assumed away relative probability between differing characters ('e' is more frequently ending a line that an 'x' or a 'z,' for example). I'm sure I've missed something else; that's a 100% probability. But 1.45 in 10 trillion is a pretty small number with which to begin when you're trying to pare it down to a manageable improbability. If you do, I'll throw at you the fact that in the finite population of 15,300 lines and there are many more occurrences of 5 e's and still more occurrences of 4 e's and still more occurrences of 3 e'.

So, if you are back testing me, try searching for a book that has 6 consecutive non poem lines that begin with an 'e' or any specific letter. Errr, if you finally get 6 consecutive heads.

Here is what proved to me TTTTA would have dozens, if not hundreds, of acrostic words which the author wanted us to find and use as a teaching device…and possibly a multi themed map:

And one last thought. If you start flipping a coin to see how long it takes to get 6 heads in a row….well, you have less of a life that I have.

This stuff isn't random. Mr. Gann designed his training curriculum in TTTTA and it is teaching math and physics among other systems.

Jim Ross

↧

2016 and the "Map of Time"

September 15, 2015, 7:05 am

≫ Next: 11/9/2015 or 11/9/2016...or perhaps October 19, 2016 AND 11/9/2016

≪ Previous: Variety; 1) The Map of Time, advance and setback 2) Revisiting the improbability of a telestic word of 6 e's

Conceptually, the "Map of Time" (MOT) that is created by the line properties of "The Tunnel Thru the Air" is proven, in my opinion, by the correlation it creates between the computed date of September 11, 2001 and the number of deaths that occurred on that date; both total deaths and deaths excluding the 19 terrorists. Originally, the number of deaths was one off. Since publishing a rough description of the MOT, I have found an error in the line mechanism that correlates with both measures of fatalities perfectly. The error of one life is not gone. That essay is found HERE.

Which is not to say the MOT is any where close to perfection. I believe Mr. Gann contrived the August 30, 1932 date (the last date in TTTTA) only to create the correlation of 9/11/2001 and total deaths. Other notable dates such as Pearl Harbor and others do not work. What is missing is a better understanding of the geometric structure that has been formed, the correct dimension of the structure formed and the correct beginning point.

My still in progress research suggests the geometric structure formed is an isosceles triangle and the idealized time period is 168 years (which happens to be the Biblical hours in a week) and the correct beginning point. I have, what I consider to be, substantial evidence of the former two items and some clues to the correct beginning point. I'll forego discussing those items because the mathematic model is not complete enough to provide a level of accuracy of prediction which will prove itself. The model is not proven to a granularity of a daily period. On the other hand, I am having success with the model suggesting years in which comparable events occur.

But first, one observation regarding the number 168. It is comprised of 2X2X2X3X7. Alternately, we might comprise it as 2X12X7. The numbers of 12 and 7 are striking to me, initially, because they are the reduction of the ratio of the number of pages of TTTTA (including title page, blank pages, back cover, etc.) and John Dee's Monas Heiroglyphica number or 432 / 252. I have discussed these numbers extensively in this blog including HERE, HERE, and HERE. The observation is this. The number 168 and the MOT would seem to be a map of the time of mankind and not the map of the time of the life of the USA. To that conclusion I find the following math to be highly suggestive:

2016 / 168 = 12.0000

The year 2016 divided by the 168 is the Biblically notable number and the number highly favored by Mr. Gann, 12. Again, it would seem suggestive not of a period in the life of the USA but in the new life of mankind.

With the background of the MOT developed, the point of this post is otherwise not the nature of the MOT but a very preliminary prediction of the nature of the year 2016. Indeed, we might be seeing the clouds occurring in current events in the US and Europe now.

There are three points to the isosceles triangle the comprises the MOT and which are highly suggestive; August 30, 1932 (the beginning point as presently configured based on the last date in TTTTA) is the point of the angle that is not equal to the other two equal angles. The other two points will fall with the years 2016 and 1848.

If you will study the nature of 1848 and, particularly, the proliferation of national revolutions that swept through Europe, I would suggest this is the larger time frame suggestion of the MOT.

Previous to this time, I have presented suggestions of the character of 2016 which might be derived from possible clues that Mr. Gann might have left. Perhaps they will prove correct. But they were not based on a mechanism that has a provable link, however tenuous you might view it, to an event that has occurred (the 9/11/2001 correlation in the MOT). This "suggestion" would seem, at least to me, to have a far elevated level of gravity associated with it.

I hope I am wrong.

Jim Ross

↧